Hola! I have read the pages of this thread, and see that a few people have hit the nail on the head - anonymity and de-individualization - is the issue at hand. I just wish I were at home where I have access to my Master's papers; I could cite you many references.
But really, is there a need to continue the bias? When we dehumanize one person, we dehumanize everyone.
Fortunately, the forum has evolved along with its denizens and I see a lot more effort made to be reasonable.
First, the bias will continue until there is a means to mark every move on the Internet with its author. De-huminization is an alternate term for the de-individualization that is a psychological phenomena of the Internet.
I post under my nick name, but do not hide who I am! I do think you should be willing to say it to some ones face if your going to say it!
Forgitaboutit! This isn't about "ought to" and "should" or about manners or bad writing skills. The ugliness by individuals is deliberate . . . non-deliberate hurtful statements will follow with an apology if the ugliness is pointed out.
However, let's also be sure what this thread is NOT about: allowing only homogeneous ideas and opinions.
Just because someone disagrees with you, DOES NOT MEAN that they are bashing you.
We don't want to eliminate controversy: just the unneeded friction that arises when someone refuses to convert to your line of thinking. We don't want to become irrelevant, but we surely don't want to become elitist either. It's a balance that is worth maintaining.
Let there be no doubt - the civility of this forum is directly attributable to the mods, and the personalities of the individuals that hit the "Report" button.
The anonymity of the Internet leads to de-individualization (de-humanization) of individuals. Individuals affected by this do not conciously turn into evil fiends; there is much arguement whether this is the 'real person' coming out or merely a 'shedding' of social norms due to the belief that one will 'never' be found out, combined with a lack of feedback of the individual's behavior.
In a face-to-face situation, if one snaps out a testy comment, there is feedback in the form of hurt silence, shocked looks, or comeback. In the Internet, there is nothing.
Add to the above the obvious problems with miscommmunication due to writing skills, English-as-a-second language, or even typing in an airport with the "wrong" glasses on, you have more opportunity for the now-non-inhibited individual to "say" what s/he wishes.
The mods, and the "Report" button, are what provides feedback to the individual and should be used immediately in trolling situations. I have been very impressed, however, by members of the forum that will 'step up' and say "That was mean!", and see the perp back off.
This is such an issue in industry that handling such people/incidences is a many-session seminar in Chief Information Courses. In industry, such behavior (emails, etc) is referred immediately to the supervisor. In this forum, well --
Good job, mods!
. . . and
Cave Diver disagrees because he is a Grinch!
:blinking: