I own both OMS and Pressed Steel tanks. My OMS valves are on a couple of Aluminum 80's 'cause I don't like 'em but I'm too cheap to throw 'em out.
I have my OMS 85's doubled with the Scubapro isolation manifold, whose valves I find much smoother and easier than OMS's. The OMS 85's are, in my opinion, the "sweetest" doubles I've ever used - lighter but still with excellent buoyancy characteristics.
The Pressed Steel 95's (that used to be my doubles before I got the OMS's) are rigged with "H" valves (Scubapro) and are used in environments where doubles aren't needed but full redundancy still is.
The principle difference in the Pressed Steel and OMS tanks is weight - for any given size, OMS are considerably lighter, yet maintain excellent buoyancy characteristics. OMS tanks are also more expensive.
As for composite tanks, their buoyancy characteristics are terrible - they float like corks.
Rick
I have my OMS 85's doubled with the Scubapro isolation manifold, whose valves I find much smoother and easier than OMS's. The OMS 85's are, in my opinion, the "sweetest" doubles I've ever used - lighter but still with excellent buoyancy characteristics.
The Pressed Steel 95's (that used to be my doubles before I got the OMS's) are rigged with "H" valves (Scubapro) and are used in environments where doubles aren't needed but full redundancy still is.
The principle difference in the Pressed Steel and OMS tanks is weight - for any given size, OMS are considerably lighter, yet maintain excellent buoyancy characteristics. OMS tanks are also more expensive.
As for composite tanks, their buoyancy characteristics are terrible - they float like corks.
Rick