"However, I've never signed a waiver that said "I understand that the diver you randomly buddy me with on the boat probably won't be able to rescue me if I have a problem." Diving is generally a buddy sport. As I've said, you do both yourself and your buddy a disservice by not taking rescue.
There's another thread going on right now bashing people who won't dive with new divers. If the reason for that is that the diver is not rescue certified and might not be able to save their buddy, I honestly don't see a problem with that logic."
No, I don't see the problem with that logic, so why are you randomly buddied with an OW buddy? Another thread with DM's talks about DMs being given the newbies. Mike pointed out they could request another buddy.
Didn't want to retort-All I'm saying about the rescue class:
1) I personally find it an imperative class and makes safer divers
2) I do not believe in forcing anyone to do anything, but you can provide them with the facts and related information so they can make up their own mind
3) I like the PADI system of introducing divers to the skills in a step process. As I have said in other threads, PADI strongly recommends further training <PADI bashing has equated this with give me more money, but that only deters divers from their education>. I do believe a diver should be comfortable with their OW skills and dive some before beginning their next classes. I do not recommend that they make deep (>60fsw) dives, or that they end their education there. However, I think they will learn the OW, AOW, and Rescue material more thoroughly if each is independently taught.
I mention that some divers take the OW class and go to the Caribbean and that's all their diving. It is said the resort classes teach this well under supervision. Two things:
Diving is not for everyone. I like that like a bad relationship, a diver can abort training at OW, AOW, or Rescue, at whatever point, without the 20 year bad marriage.
Also, who says a smart OW student shouldn't seek out supervision over their dives?
There's another thread going on right now bashing people who won't dive with new divers. If the reason for that is that the diver is not rescue certified and might not be able to save their buddy, I honestly don't see a problem with that logic."
No, I don't see the problem with that logic, so why are you randomly buddied with an OW buddy? Another thread with DM's talks about DMs being given the newbies. Mike pointed out they could request another buddy.
Didn't want to retort-All I'm saying about the rescue class:
1) I personally find it an imperative class and makes safer divers
2) I do not believe in forcing anyone to do anything, but you can provide them with the facts and related information so they can make up their own mind
3) I like the PADI system of introducing divers to the skills in a step process. As I have said in other threads, PADI strongly recommends further training <PADI bashing has equated this with give me more money, but that only deters divers from their education>. I do believe a diver should be comfortable with their OW skills and dive some before beginning their next classes. I do not recommend that they make deep (>60fsw) dives, or that they end their education there. However, I think they will learn the OW, AOW, and Rescue material more thoroughly if each is independently taught.
I mention that some divers take the OW class and go to the Caribbean and that's all their diving. It is said the resort classes teach this well under supervision. Two things:
Diving is not for everyone. I like that like a bad relationship, a diver can abort training at OW, AOW, or Rescue, at whatever point, without the 20 year bad marriage.
Also, who says a smart OW student shouldn't seek out supervision over their dives?