cornfed
Mindless lemming
chrpai once bubbled...
I thought I already defended WKPP on that subject and said essentially that very same thing.
You... um... err... nevermind.

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
chrpai once bubbled...
I thought I already defended WKPP on that subject and said essentially that very same thing.
So what you are saying is that you refused to answer even one direct question even after I took the time to respond point by point to your post and your only true intention is to turn this thread into another solo debate..
chrpai once bubbled...
GUE doesn't have an OW cert and they aren't a member of RSTC, so other then nice to have merit badges, why should a charter except them solely by themselves?
O-ring once bubbled...
Painter and Genesis...get a freakin clue before you start running off at the mouth again. You have both been given numerous chances to bow out of this debate but it almost seems like you are determined to keep making yourselves look more and more idiotic. Were you aware that you have to be an NSS-CDS member to access certain dive sites? OMG! A conspiracy!
Genesis once bubbled...
Did 'ya read the post Mike?
I answered your question. The answer is in the last two paragraphs.
Go back and re-read it please.
Its there.
chrpai once bubbled...
They was the DIR proponents, not Scubaboard.
O-ring once bubbled...
Likewise...somehow I think we will both get over it though..
chrpai once bubbled...
I'm really not that bad in real life.
You want to know why I care, this is why. It is that the incessant pontification by you, GI (now departed, so I assume that will stop) and others "involved" in the GUE advocacy process that bother me, when the facts simply don't support the claims.
Some of that will draw a response, but only one - like your claim that somehow the other agency programs are responsible for the high "drop out" rate, and comparing diving to skiing. That's so silly as to be rediculous, and has to be a result of willful blindness - as I pointed out.
But when we are talking about diving fatalities, and claims are being made of differences in safety, I argue that before some agency takes a position, either officially or through their spokespeople (named or defacto), the ducks had better all be lined up in a nice, neat row, and the statistical evidence had better be clear before the claims are made - because the outcome of such pontifications is often intervention and interference with freedom.