... you cannot see.
Kane, have you talked with lawmakers in California or anywhere else on scuba-related issues?
Do you deny that you've promoted the idea that "diving DIR" would have prevented some people's deaths out there, recently, to the point of, in some people's opinion, dancing on gravestones?
Do you deny that you attempted, in the last couple of months, to portrey solo diving as extremely dangerous, but failed to point out that as a percentage of all deaths over the period in which you cited, it did not amount to a statistically-significant percentage of the total, and further, your stats included UNINTENTIONAL solo divers - in fact, nearly ALL of your "solo fatalities" were UNINTENTIONALLY solo!
Do you deny that when called on the above, you went oddly silent and refused to support your claim?
C'mon Mike. You can't deny any of the above.
You've stated all of the above.
How many dots do I need to connect?
Has GUE's attempt to close dive sites been limited to Wakulla? 'Fess up Mike - has anyone from GUE tried to close any OTHER sites? And why close Wakulla? Have priority over it, ok. But CLOSE IT to non-WKPP members? Why?
Let's be honest here Mike. Do you REALLY support my right to dive as I wish? Or would you REALLY like to see it be illegal - not just a violation of your agency standard, but actually against the law - for me to get in my boat and head off to have a nice solo dive tomorrow morning?
If you really support my right to dive as I wish, then why all the public pontification and back-door activity in advocacy of exactly the opposite?