What is your favorite tank for singles??

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

PST E7-100s if you could find any, second choice would be Worthington X7-100s, third choice would be Faber LP85s.
 
I own 4 Worthington X7-100's, with one pair as a set of doubles. My gal has two Genesis HP100's as singles. The HP100's work for us.

Worthington being one of the USA's largest cylinder manufacturers is a more solid company than PST these days. DOT standards were questionable there for awhile. I would use either brand though.
 
.From time to time you can get hp100 fabers for about $250.00 from Divers Direct.

The FX-100. Easy to dive with. Another favorite is the Faber LP-85. Filled to 3,000psi, it is about 100 cu.ft. The overfill is becoming less available in my area, however.
 
HP100's are great tanks. I can use LP 95's, but they are pretty short, and it takes some work to keep myself in trim (I'm 6'1''). My next set of tanks will be 130's.
 
My favorite tank = a rental aluminum 80 down in the warm water of the Caribbean. :D


I do dive steel normally and I dive in Maine. :rolleyes:
 
HP100 steel.

the K
 
When looking at these comments I have to keep reminding myself that most of you are using heavy accessories like steel plates, otherwise the comments about buoyancy don't make sense. I mean, I consider the HP100 to be a very light tank, best for tropical diving. Of course, if the diver is coming from a past history of very heavy, but buoyant, aluminum tanks that HP100 must look miraculous in comparison.
 
As far as buoyancy goes, the FX-100 or Worthington is just as favorable to a Florida diver as the LP-95, if not better. I've had both 95's and 100's and my preference is more about the on-land weight and size.

As for the really negative cylinders, why would you want to have so much weight that you can't ditch?
 

Back
Top Bottom