It's also worth noting that different versions of the Buhlmann GF algo may give different results... even using the same flavor may vary depending on how it's implemented by the manufacturer.
For example, on one of my favorite mobile apps ZHL16-B is the algo provided and typically I might dial a 25/75 GF. However, when running the desktop version of MultiDeco using ZHL-16C which is more conservative, I might dial in a 40/80 GF setting to get similar runtimes... and on the Petrel Deco Planner which also uses ZHL-16C, I have to dial in something like a 45/90 GF setting to match up the run times. So it helps to indicate which version of the Buhlmann algo is being used and even by what manufacturer.
Anyway, the settings indicated above seem to be working well for me and strike a balance of not being overly conservative and getting me out of the water safely and feeling ok.
For example, on one of my favorite mobile apps ZHL16-B is the algo provided and typically I might dial a 25/75 GF. However, when running the desktop version of MultiDeco using ZHL-16C which is more conservative, I might dial in a 40/80 GF setting to get similar runtimes... and on the Petrel Deco Planner which also uses ZHL-16C, I have to dial in something like a 45/90 GF setting to match up the run times. So it helps to indicate which version of the Buhlmann algo is being used and even by what manufacturer.
Anyway, the settings indicated above seem to be working well for me and strike a balance of not being overly conservative and getting me out of the water safely and feeling ok.