Being a friend of the deceased is in no way a credential enabling him to determine the cause of his friend's death. Yes, I know that you think he got the facts right, but I submit that a contributory factor in that belief is that it supports your personal agenda. It is what you want to believe, which is fine, but when you state it as established fact rather than your opinion, then I must disagree.He was one of the dead man's best friends. Yeah, I think he got the facts right. If one of your loved ones died on one of your trips, I would not grill you for proof on COD.
Again, I am not saying that I know otherwise, but when you state that his death was a "confirmed case of CO poisoning", it is a patently false statement if all you have for "proof" is the statement of an inexpert witness. Show me a coroner's report. Oh, right, "they" don't want you to know... "They" may not, but the fact that a CO poisoning ruling might be bad for business isn't proof that that's what it was, either.