I guess for the record I should disclaim and state - Despite my comments in this thread -
Retailers have specifically recommended that DIN sealing plugs should NOT be used on high F02 cylinders. See Twin manifold plugs
I got curious and looked around a bit ... DGX makes almost the exact same statement for their (equivalent? - same?) plug (
DGX HP Sealing DIN Plug | Dive Gear Express®), but interestingly not on their push-button plug (
DGX HP Sealing DIN Plug w/Pressure Release | Dive Gear Express®) - by intent or omission, I don't know, but the push button one is only listed as Nitrox ready.
- Of merit, DGX provides a much more thorough explanation of the issues of releasing pressure with a pressurized, plugged valve. Worth checking out. -
Serious question for others out there - Is this "standard" received wisdom, something from the manufacturer's lawyers as a CYA, or from the folks that deal with high FO2 as hands on experts.
I am dubious about the relative risk of the impact claim as both the burst plug and valve mechanism are also vulnerable to impacts and exposed to the gas at full pressure, all the time.
Obviously, it is much easier to keep the internals of the cylinder and valve clean, than the DIN socket and plug. So in that regard, yes, the risk is relatively higher, but also applies when a reg is on there and pressurized too.
As for the venting/friction the same sorts of mechanical processes are also present during cylinder filling with whipping/boosting and venting. Again, hopefully in a meticulously clean environment.
I think it really comes down the relative risk of being seriously O2 clean and plugged vs The risk O2 jetting out into a confined, potentially fuel rich environment.
Maybe I am very wrong in my thinking about the relative risks ...