Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I thought the concern raised in undercurrent had already been "put to bed" by other rebreather divers. If I remember right, they explained that after he passed out on the surface, he would have dropped the rebreather mouthpiece. Then the rebreather counterlung would have flooded making him very negative and that would cause him to sink to the bottom despite initially having been buoyant.There is a new article in Oct Undercurrent on this.
Page 13, titled "Was There a Cover-Up in This Diver’s Death?"
Which brings up the point. Had ANYONE been paying the least attention to Rob, they would have seen him sink and could maybe have done something about it. Instead we searched for 2 more days.I thought the concern raised in undercurrent had already been "put to bed" by other rebreather divers. If I remember right, they explained that after he passed out on the surface, he would have dropped the rebreather mouthpiece. Then the rebreather counterlung would have flooded making him very negative and that would cause him to sink to the bottom despite initially having been buoyant.
Yep. I think the excuse was that sotis was on deck passed out and "everyone" was dealing with that. That doesn't sound like something that would hold up in court to me, but I'm not a lawyer.Which brings up the point. Had ANYONE been paying the least attention to Rob, they would have seen him sink and could maybe have done something about it. Instead we searched for 2 more days.
While the Coast Guard and Stewart’s family were out searching an area the size of Connecticut because they though Stewart was alive and drifting on the surface, the people who actually saw him sink were at the site, ready to do a search and recovery, after being forbidden to do so .
I was sure I saw a link to the ROV video on SB that clearly showed his mouthpiece still in situ (ie still in his mouth)I thought the concern raised in undercurrent had already been "put to bed" by other rebreather divers. If I remember right, they explained that after he passed out on the surface, he would have dropped the rebreather mouthpiece. Then the rebreather counterlung would have flooded making him very negative and that would cause him to sink to the bottom despite initially having been buoyant.
The official report said the BOV was not in his mouth when found. I have seen the raw video. I had a hard time telling.I was sure I saw a link to the ROV video on SB that clearly showed his mouthpiece still in situ (ie still in his mouth)
I could of course be mistaken @Wookie can maybe confirm
I have most of the filings, and access to all of them.I believe the "official report" is available from the clerk's office via a website. At one point I was attempting to read all the documents they'd posted about the case, but I quickly gave up.
If you dig up the original thread on the incident, buried deep inside it are links to the case files. It might be easier to just search for the clerk's office information directly than pouring through that lengthy thread.
Note that some of the documents will be listed, but require you to "request" they be made available online. I made an attempt at doing that myself. I'm not sure if the availability online was temporary or permanent.
Edit: You don't have to file a FOIA act request to get the files, all you have to do is click a request button on the website. Someone will process it, it takes a few days if I remember right.