Subfiend
Contributor
- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 447
- # of dives
- I just don't log dives
The case has resolved.Has the Stewart parents case against Sotis and Horizon Divers progressed?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The case has resolved.Has the Stewart parents case against Sotis and Horizon Divers progressed?
Which way? What did they conclude? Was Sotis found liable?The case has resolved.
Settlements are typically not discussedWhich way? What did they conclude? Was Sotis found liable?
Finally some real data here, that could save more diver's lives.This data ... The case is now over and the evidence obtained can be discussed publicly.
The case was resolved before trial, so nobody was found liable.Which way? What did they conclude? Was Sotis found liable?
The actual diluent was 10/50. The divers filmed themselves discussing the dive plan the day before, including programming the dive computers to calculate decompression obligations using a 10/20 diluent instead of 10/50. Stewart and Sotis discussed doing this to avoid the helium penalty, with Sotis saying: "If you don't account for it, it won't penalize you." Stewart was a TDI-certified Advanced Trimix Instructor, so he knew exactly what this meant.The diluent says "10/20." Possibly a lie to the computers to avoid helium penalty (?)
What was the actual diluent?
Triple dives to 60+ metres with GF 90/90 (on "10/20") is hyper aggressive.
Did they consider gas emboli resulting in stroke?
I can't imagine that they weren't on 10/50. It's a favorite mix in the USA, I've made thousands of cubic feet of it. They wouldn't be the first folks I know personally that fudged the numbers on their shearwaters.Finally some real data here, that could save more diver's lives.
The diluent says "10/20." Possibly a lie to the computers to avoid helium penalty (?)
What was the actual diluent?
Triple dives to 60+ metres with GF 90/90 (on "10/20") is hyper aggressive.
Did they consider gas emboli resulting in stroke?
Maybe they did, but I can't keep track of the dozen different "conclusions" aired in the absence of open data.
Stewart was a TDI-certified Advanced Trimix Instructor. The B-roll shot on January 30, 2017 shows that he knew exactly what he was doing and he agreed to the dive plan. They filmed the dive plan meeting twice from different angles, and the camera picked up a further side conversation between Sotis and Stewart discussing programming 10/20 into the dive computers to avoid the helium penalty and get more bottom time.Remember, Stewart wasn't exceptionally experienced (is that a nice way to say it?) He likely did as he was told.
How was Stewart a TDI-certified Advanced Trimix Instructor? He didn't log enough hours to be a trimix diver according to what I've heard.Stewart was a TDI-certified Advanced Trimix Instructor. The B-roll shot on January 30, 2017 shows that he knew exactly what he was doing and he agreed to the dive plan. They filmed the dive plan meeting twice from different angles, and the camera picked up a further side conversation between Sotis and Stewart discussing programming 10/20 into the dive computers to avoid the helium penalty and get more bottom time.