OneBrightGator:Not really, the problem with the Pinto was a proven design flaw Ford chose to accept (in fact they did a study and it would have cost more to fix the problem then settle the resulting lawsuits and deaths) there's nothing inherently wrong with SP or Apeks regs, something or someone has to break them, not either manufacturers' choice.
There is nothing wrong with the designs of this equipment that is not what I meant when I started this. The basic design types, piston and diaphragm, are sound, personally the one big draw back to the piston designs, the metal dynamic exposed sealing surface, is enough to out weigh its benefits for me.
Lets say that the machined housing had a hairline crack running through it and it made it out to the public. My intent was to point out the invalid argument everyone involved in the industry makes. That being something like We care so much about your safety that we will supply free parts to a qualified technician, (as long as he sales our stuff) to service your equipment every year. Now buy this brand new/unused from someone that is not a dealer in the US and we offer no warranty. Now if this were about safety, they would be willing to extend a warranty out to anything they have made for a number of years. Who needs the warranty anyway all it would cover would be the standard manufacturing defects etcetera and they probably would cover those anyway.
Its about the money, keeping a closed market closed
Truva