kwinter
Contributor
But I have always preferred 7.25" diameter tanks to 8" fatties. It makes an even bigger difference in sidemount configuration.
iPhone. iTypo. iApologize.
iPhone. iTypo. iApologize.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I argued with tbone and lost, the Faber 85s are thinner than the HP100s....that's what he's referring to.But I have always preferred 7.25" diameter tanks to 8" fatties. It makes an even bigger difference in sidemount configuration.
iPhone. iTypo. iApologize.
~109 at 3442
That's close enough. Point was that 85's are often compared to 120's, but they only hold about 110cf. The Faber FX100's hold the same water volume as the 85's but are a bit shorter since they have the bigger OD and will always get you 110cf instead of the 85's which will only get you there if someone over fills them.
it wouldn't be 109 cf. the 100 cf rating is accurate because it accounts for the compressibility factor for air at high pressure. same reason a aluminum 80 is only 77.4 cf.
water volume/ideal gas calculations would be the same value. the real capacity is the ideal gas capacity or water capacity times service pressure divided by the compressibility factor.
as for your asahi tanks, if you can find the water volume spec for them, it is a pretty straightforward calculation to take the water volume and multiply by service pressure for a value in liters then convert to cu ft. at that point, you divide by the compressibility factor for that pressure and see whether the manufacturer is selling it based on ideal gas capacity or true capacity.