BWAHAHAHAHA! You have NO idea
Ber :lilbunny:
Are we still talking about fins?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
BWAHAHAHAHA! You have NO idea
Ber :lilbunny:
Gotta bring that photo out of photobucket into the scubaboard gallery for me to see it, photobucket is blocked at work and I'm on 28.8 dial up at home.Well, if you would not wear the Jet upside down I think it would help. Did you cut about four inches off the Jet because my SuperJets (Jet XL now) are about four inches longer than my Rockets. There may have been a larger Rocket, don't know for sure, mine are the standard size version.
One thing, the smaller size Jets with the shorter blades are not an equal to the Jet XL. That is one thing I would change, size L Jets should have the same balde size as the XL but they do not. Still, the Jet of any size is a better fin than the Rocket.
Notice the Jet beside the horrid Rocket.
N
Ummmmm yes?Are we still talking about fins?
The military also pays a 1,000 dollars for a hammer. I have owned and used Rockets since they came out and still have two pairs, left over, one new and my wife has the Mini Rockets. Compared to Power Planas or Super Jets they are like wearing lead chunks on your feet. The military is not the end all know all.
The only time I would bother with Rockets is during a vintage "era" dive when I am modeling myself years ago before I knew any better.
N
OK, Nemrod and Walter, I went and got the "book" out (no, you can't have a copy) to give you the final version of CURRENT MILITARY THINKING ON FINS, AND I QUOTE:
"There are three factors to keep in mind when you are selecting a fin; the specfic design characteristics of the fin, the physical attributes particular to your body, and OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS. Fins, by increasing the surface area of the foot, serve to magnify the thrust delivered by the legs. Kicking with fins involves a forward stroke and a backward stroke. Several examples will illustrate how three factors interact to influence the fin selection.
SDV operations require an operator to sit with fins on for a long period of time. The operator may require thermal protection and he may have a flexible ankle. Space is limited so a shorter fin is necessary. For this situation, the operator should select a short, wide fin with a strap that can be adjusted for varying amounts of thermal wear.
Surface swimming with gear will involve a sidestroke flutterkick............when power is needed for both forward and backward kick, like in sidestoke, a straight symmetrical fin MAY be more efficient for you.
Underwater swimming involves a face down position., where the forward stroke is down and the backward stroke is up towards the surface of the water. In this position,gravity assists with the downstroke and produces a less symmetical type of thrust than seen with sidestroke kick. You should select A HIGH-TECH DIVING FIN with moderate flexibility and an integral type footbox. The fin should have an offset design to allow a more efficient transfer of prpulsion force.
For bodysurfing, use short surf fins.
PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES INFLUENCING FIN SELECTION:
If your ankle range of motion is inherently limited, long fins will assist in transmitting lower extremity forces to the water.
If your ankles are inherently flexible, short fins may be more efficient as well as LESS STRESSFUL ON ANKLE JOINTS.
Your natural kick frequency will also influence your choice of fin stiffness and size. LARGER SIZES AND STIFFNESS produces a SLOWER rate of kicking, while short FLEXIBLE fins allow a HIGHER rate of kicking.
THE FIT OF THE FIN IS CRITICAL:
If the fin is too tight, the finbox may make your foot cramp up and more susceptible to cold. If too loose, energy is lost in the slop between foot and footbox; slop also translaes into foot chafe. Booties provide grip for the foot within the footbox and the neoprene acts to even out areas where stress is concentrated.
OTHER FIN SELECTION CONSIDERATIONS:
Fins vary slightly in buoyancy; about half of sport fin models float and the remainder sink. THIS MAY BE AN OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATION. In the April 1996 Rodale's Scuba Diving fin test, fins testing as "outstanding" in the area of power included the expensive SCUBAPRO GORILLA, MARES/PLANA AVANTI, OCEAN EDGE SPECTRA and the US DIVERS BLADES.
However, so did the IDI Frog Foot and Power Fin models which have been the standard fins in the Teams for many years.
In spite of extensive research and a multiplicity of designs applied to modern fins, there are still tried and true fins that perform as well as many of the top newer models.The older, buckle-style stap fastners have the advantage of being reversible and are far less likely to foul in fishing line or seaweed than fastners on newer models, many of which have quick release buckles. The simple straps on old models have no plastic to break, are easy and inexpensive to replace and can be found in almost any dive store. These fins are also not as slippery on deck as newer designs.
All sounds like ROCKET science to me!
The military is not the end all know all. There were not any WMD in Iraq either so best sometimes check what the civies use.N
It's the price of living in the middle of nowhere, we don't have cable either and can't get DSL.Cannot help you Ber with the Photobucket, scubabash.com does not host pics very well and this being the 21st century perhaps you and my parents are the only set of remaining humans on the planet still on dial up.
Did you always wear different color socks?
N