One detail that may or may not be significant that I left out of my report on the well-wishing discussion (because I thought it would generate inappropriate discussion for that thread): Apparently, the scans showed John had a massive undiagnosed cancerous mass in his liver*. However, all the immediate damage was caused by a pulmonary embolism (and the resulting clots interfering with blood flow to the brain), most likely triggered by a mild DCS hit.
Now, I'm not sure what role the liver plays vis-a-vis DCS and bubbles (even sub-clinical bubbles). But from another thread here I did read an interesting study very recently regarding liver function tests in a group of divers on an extended dive vacation, diving every day. Some divers were drinking in the evenings, and some were not. Yet tests showed that ALL of them had signs of highly elevated liver function, especially the women (whose levels were so severe as to be similar to mild hepatitis!).
Maybe some of the physicians here can elaborate, but to my layman's ears that seems to indicate that the liver may play more of a role in processing heavily nitrogenated blood (or some other effect of diving) than we currently understand. And for a diver with reduced liver functionality - like this situation - that may have made the difference between taking a DCS hit or not, since like I mentioned before, John did not violate his computer, and his profiles were no different than practically everyone else diving Jupiter that day or any other day.
Those computers are based on algorithms, which in turn are based on empirical data, probably gained from healthy Navy divers. I'll bet you anything those algorithms don't take into account reduced liver function, but presume 100% functionality from the diver's physiology.
Dunno, just speculating - but that's part of what this thread is for. If diving itself was part of the problem here, it should be alarming for us divers, because John was diving within accepted parameters. Therefore, it would be nice to find something here that made the difference.
I also can't help but think that John would like to have known that his incident served some positive function within the dive community he loved so much, that we all learned something from it, maybe something to help prevent another diver from going through what he did.
>*< Fritz
*CORRECTION/AMPLIFICATION: I just met with his family as they came to pick up John's car. Apparently the mass was located on his kidneys and there is evidence that it spread to his liver. The local M.E. is deciding whether or not to autopsy; we'll know more if he does, but of course the family would prefer they don't.
Now, I'm not sure what role the liver plays vis-a-vis DCS and bubbles (even sub-clinical bubbles). But from another thread here I did read an interesting study very recently regarding liver function tests in a group of divers on an extended dive vacation, diving every day. Some divers were drinking in the evenings, and some were not. Yet tests showed that ALL of them had signs of highly elevated liver function, especially the women (whose levels were so severe as to be similar to mild hepatitis!).
Maybe some of the physicians here can elaborate, but to my layman's ears that seems to indicate that the liver may play more of a role in processing heavily nitrogenated blood (or some other effect of diving) than we currently understand. And for a diver with reduced liver functionality - like this situation - that may have made the difference between taking a DCS hit or not, since like I mentioned before, John did not violate his computer, and his profiles were no different than practically everyone else diving Jupiter that day or any other day.
Those computers are based on algorithms, which in turn are based on empirical data, probably gained from healthy Navy divers. I'll bet you anything those algorithms don't take into account reduced liver function, but presume 100% functionality from the diver's physiology.
Dunno, just speculating - but that's part of what this thread is for. If diving itself was part of the problem here, it should be alarming for us divers, because John was diving within accepted parameters. Therefore, it would be nice to find something here that made the difference.
I also can't help but think that John would like to have known that his incident served some positive function within the dive community he loved so much, that we all learned something from it, maybe something to help prevent another diver from going through what he did.
>*< Fritz
*CORRECTION/AMPLIFICATION: I just met with his family as they came to pick up John's car. Apparently the mass was located on his kidneys and there is evidence that it spread to his liver. The local M.E. is deciding whether or not to autopsy; we'll know more if he does, but of course the family would prefer they don't.
Last edited: