ams511
Contributor
This is exactly why I would only buy 1st stages with a swivel turret and 5th LP port.
I would also specifically look for a swivel turret that will let you rotate it a full 360 degrees while there are hoses installed.
I have Dive Rite XT regs. They have a swivel turret and bottom LP port. But, when there are hoses installed in any of the turret ports, you cannot rotate it a full 360 degrees because the hose will hit the DIN hand wheel.
I regularly dive in cold, silty water. 37F degrees and sometimes visibility is less than 1 meter. I just bought ScubaPro Mk 25 EVO first stages to replace my DR XTs. They are unsealed piston regs and I am confident they will be just fine, even in cold silty water.
I am not a tech diver, but have followed the progression (or arguments) for years. This was before you got into diving. At one time the tech community was advocating using turretless first stages like the DS4 because they believed the turret was a failure point. I know in the past Scubapro had some problems with techs over-tightening the brass turret nut that caused them to fail but that was fixed when they went to a stainless nut. Perhaps this is where the thought came from. For a while Scubapro made regulators with a non-rotating turret like the Atomic Z2, I forget their model numbers.
At the same time, the thought was that you should have a low performing unbalanced second stage as your backup to reduce the chance of a freeflow.
These two recommendations have fallen out of favor. However, another recommendation that still remains is the use of sealed first stage regulator. As someone that collects (OK hoards) regulators I have come across a few MK-5 specs and older MK-20s that had junk in the ambient chamber. Whether this is due to poor rinsing or the fact that they couldn't get the junk out because of the small holes, I cannot say. What I can say it that they all worked properly even with the the junk inside.
As you know but the newbies don't, is that Scubaboard has a strong bias against unsealed piston first stages. The fact that they have been used successfully on thousands if not millions of dives does not seem to register with the collective conscience. Also the fact that most regulators will not see the inside of a cave or a wreck is also forgotten.
I am sure the MK-25s will do fine. My only grip against them is the cost.