Not relevant to Florida, but since the 'shark feed close encounters vs. natural, distant encounter' topic of shark photography has come up, and others may view this thread, it may be of interest that you can get fairly large, scary looking but reasonably 'safe' (on the condition no one does anything foolish) sharks in close without baiting or shark feeding - on the offshore wreck diving out of North Carolina (
trip report).
Kate Rister:
There are 2 separate issues here. You can do a Forum search, or browse several pages of the Shark Forum section of Scuba Board, and read some extended discussions. The 2 key issues:
1.) Personal risk perception. Scuba diving entails some risk - drowning, etc... You consider these risks sufficiently low/mitigated & the rewards sufficient that you dive anyway. The fact some people die doing this doesn't scare you off. There are some who would choose differently. People vary in their view of the risks in varied circumstances (e.g.: the adequacy of modern mainstream OW training).
Okay, the issue of diving with fairly large, powerful predatory animals (albeit not natural predators of humans) presents similar personal risk vs. reward assessment issues.
2.) Supporting baiting/feeding of sharks for recreational diving. Some people believe this has little impact, or at least very low
serious impact (e.g.: reef sharks might come a bit closer & check people out more often, but some think are unlikely to accost divers outside these specialty dives), and encourage public appreciation of sharks & conservation. Some people believe it's at substantial risk to cause danger - sharks accosting divers outside of shark feedings dives, which could lead to bites, or frightened humans retaliating, either of which could lead to pressure for shark culls.
These issues can, have been, hashed out at length. Only you can decide them for you. The forum discussions on it make for interesting, informative reading, whatever position you choose.
Richard.