Not an idiot, just not really open to critique despite the title. The bladder is nice and well made - just isn't needed in the ocean in the first place
Apologies for how I stated that. It is just like a disclaimer that the internet is not an authoritative place.
It is also an attempt to be self-deprecating and admit that I don't want people to take my ideas as dogmatic truth.
I agree that there is no need for this bladder, but I saw some post about DPV as "redundant buoyancy".
Between, Dry-suits, lift bags, balanced rig and double bladders - I choose the balanced rig approach.
If I have to dive negative - I add second wing that is not attached to an inflator. I check that it holds air at the surface, empty it and secure it to the right shoulder.
I think that this bladder is good enough that if I have to dive negative, I don't need the second wing. One thing I like is that you can secure it to the stage tank and any diver on the team can use it (Unless you dive solo). I have also used is successfully as a DSMB by unscrewing the cap.
I plan to install an OPV as suggested and test it as a lift bag too.
The carabiners were lying around unused in my hiking gear but I will test it with bungees and bolt snaps.
To be honest, this bag was supposed to be for hiking but I don't like using it. I prefer the Osprey Hydraulics LT 1.5Liter
And the Camelback Fusion 3Liter