Is anybody else ok with the basic premise that a for profit venture large enough to be worldwide in scope is going to, in most cases, throw out as wide a net as possible whereas a non-profit organization can offer more regimented and personalized because of its smaller size? Or how about the fact that wreck diving in the Carolinas is fundamentally different than boat diving in Koh Tao.
Maybe this conversation is so convoluted because there is a sense of perspective that's being ignored. Diving is many things to many people. Maybe the question is, "Within the PADI framework, what changes could benefit the AOW course?". As opposed to, "Within the entire scope of diving, the universe and all of the opinions she holds, what could we do to make the AOW course perfect for every living soul?"
So,
as for question one...
I think that there are more than a few Adventure Dives that are silly (boat being my favorite example, DPV being the other), but then again, I had another instructor, from another dive environment than mine, explain me a few benefits of those. He even gave me tips on how to teach DPV in my world and make it more than a ridiculous excuse to underwater race. Essentially, why drop anything? If there is a time and place for it, and as long as the more site specific dives aren't made mandatory, leave it be.
What to add/change? That's more interesting. I'd like to see underwater conservation taken more seriously in general, so I think the fish ID/naturalist modules could do with updating. I feel like the naturalist dive was born in a different era and that the AWARE dives were just slapped in later as opposed to integrated in. I'd like to see all of that more unfied, and then, perhaps, there could be separate modules for different regions. In my world, I see naturalist taught this way, and PADI's structure gets thrown out the window anyway, but I'd like to see it from them.
Any more (constructive) ideas?
Maybe this conversation is so convoluted because there is a sense of perspective that's being ignored. Diving is many things to many people. Maybe the question is, "Within the PADI framework, what changes could benefit the AOW course?". As opposed to, "Within the entire scope of diving, the universe and all of the opinions she holds, what could we do to make the AOW course perfect for every living soul?"
So,
as for question one...
I think that there are more than a few Adventure Dives that are silly (boat being my favorite example, DPV being the other), but then again, I had another instructor, from another dive environment than mine, explain me a few benefits of those. He even gave me tips on how to teach DPV in my world and make it more than a ridiculous excuse to underwater race. Essentially, why drop anything? If there is a time and place for it, and as long as the more site specific dives aren't made mandatory, leave it be.
What to add/change? That's more interesting. I'd like to see underwater conservation taken more seriously in general, so I think the fish ID/naturalist modules could do with updating. I feel like the naturalist dive was born in a different era and that the AWARE dives were just slapped in later as opposed to integrated in. I'd like to see all of that more unfied, and then, perhaps, there could be separate modules for different regions. In my world, I see naturalist taught this way, and PADI's structure gets thrown out the window anyway, but I'd like to see it from them.
Any more (constructive) ideas?