Respectfully, why is it one or the other. People are acting like carrying a pony is mutually exclusive to using proper planning.
James
Hi James, did you read the entire thread? This has been discussed.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Respectfully, why is it one or the other. People are acting like carrying a pony is mutually exclusive to using proper planning.
James
Yes I did... and it seems people still want to see it that way.Hi James, did you read the entire thread? This has been discussed.
Yes I did... and it seems people still want to see it that way.
I have yet to see an answer on why having a pony means you cannot have done proper gas planning (or adhere to it). Are pony bottles necessary on rec dives... no. However they are a hell of a benefit on some. An example I do fairly often is recreational dives with a single stage double hose reg. Without the slung pony, I do not have an alternate to provide my buddy. It is necessary in that situation. In other cases, it is a handy option to have (all the previously listed reasons, i.e. crappy instabuddy, being the crappy instabuddy, etc.). I make a plan. I dive the plan. I also plan for contingencies. I too did my stints in AFG and Iraq, but I didn't leave my capacity for "what if" there... I honed it and make decisions on my own risk benefit scale.
Respectfully,
James
Recreational diving is not necessary, if more bottom time is desired an RB is better.A pony is a waste of equipment and non-streamlined when one already has the tools to calculate the gas needed to get to the surface on back gas in an OOG situation.
However, if one finds they want more bottom time, after MG calculations, learn in doubles. The diver is still streamlined, creates less drag and conserves gas while now accomplishing a balanced rig.
Still no need for a pony bottle.
A CCR is not needed for recreational diving why are we bringing this up?
Dive Plan: Let's make a few educated assumptions that leave us all with a bit of room for conservatism.
1. Let's assume that our average surface consumption rate is ~ 20 L/ 0.75 cuft per minute.
So, before we "ok" each other as a buddy team to descend, after planning the dive and checking all of our gear, what do you think the likelihood of a catastrophic failure or the need for a pony bottle would be?
My Own Out of GAS ExperienceIf you were to have a failure, you do not have no gas instantly, .
Those are my choices. I have no objection to others using different choices on their dives. Want to use a pony? Great! Go for it? Don't want to and have good gas management skills? Great? Go for it!
I think that's how over 90% of the divers like to dive. Jump in, look around, start to ascend as their gas gets low.I am in that last sentence. On recreational dives it's rare I even bother to gas plan. I plan the dive depth and usually use an AL 80 and sometimes an AL 100. I have a good sac rate so gas planning is not necessary on recreational dives as often dive shops have time limits. Some will let me dive to 40 bar without time limits. These multilevel dives just do what you want and don't exceed NDL.
Some of these dives for me may be be down to the 35m 40m depth. But not when diving with recently certified OW or AOW most of the time the max depth will be kept to 25m. If diving with an instabuddy I will check their air from time to time. Not had an OOA with any recreational diver so far with OW or AOW in over 3 decades of diving.