...but you phrase your statements as absolutes, which positions you in a frame of experience and expertise.
This could perhaps have something to do with me not being native to this language? Just asking?
if it proved to work poorly on yours?
Then you should all be diving the Razor, because it has the most showy videos.
Not that Steve isn't that good, but HP seems to be excellent at the cutting board, camera and lights as well.
I am actually commended constantly on the way I dive by backmounting and sidemounting dive partners and what I can do with the Razor.
But from my point of view too those people just do not know better.
That's not true. People that try for perfect trim try for it, not all achieve it.
I saw some people take some weeks, but most where quite astoundingly fast to get to the point you could call 'ok'.
But perfect this is perhaps a bit to critical of most sidemount divers and their requirements, don't you think?
You said yourself it's not as easy as a book and that one needs proper training. It's clearly not that easy if one needs training to accomplish it.
Saw one diver at least in the last few years who is using this Hollis SMS100 with more skill without any training of his own than most with training. Another in a Razor, who even gave up on it because backmount is a personal challenge he wanted to continue after healing a lifting related injury sidemounting, some get all the skills for free it seems sometimes.
Laziness is complacency, and is not to be allowed in any diving or any other endeavor.
Lazyness can also be caused by boredom, etc...
Also by having gotten over the nitpicking phase at last.
You DO, in fact, present yourself on the internet, and ARE, in fact, selling the Razor to people on the internet.....even if you weren't a part of the financial transaction, you're part of the sale. You're selling people on an idea that you don't seem to have achieved.
Yes, and I am part of a great conspiracy of incompetent divers trying to sell Razors to everyone to stop the world from learning about the glory of true sidemount systems. Oops, you caught me
What's your own agenda, by the way?
Proper sidemount takes work.
Define 'proper' and the amount of work required please.
Having pride in your sidemount takes work.
Pride only blinds to personal failures. Perhaps this is happening to me at the moment
I take pride in not being proud of anything though
It's not easy. It's why you take a class. However, clipping some bottles off to yourself is a piece of cake. Doing it satisfactorily is easy if your standards are set low enough.
That much sadly is a very true statement (or happily, depends on perspective).
Your body posture and trim seems decent the whole time,
Thanks... I think...
but your tanks are badly trimmed in literally EVERY shot of "Sidemount Spass."
??
...
Don't see it...
Your valves are far too far forwards,
Have been criticized about that before, but the first stages are in exactly the position shown in Steve Martin demonstration pictures, so I do not know...
bringing your necks down and kicking your tails far too high.
Don't think so. There are a few scenes where I could have clipped into the other D-ring, but that's my own decision to make, isn't it?
It has (next to) nothing to do with overall trim and effectiveness of the system.
In one shot, your tank is finally flat.....but it's 8-12cm lower than it should be.
Not under my body in any frame, I think. That's all that is required.
If you really don't think so, I can start taking screen shots and adding centerlines for your tanks as-is and as-should.
Do you really do that for every video you make of yourself?
Why not show that first?
But please, 'as-should' away.
I might not understand that way though, as I do not think that it matters in any frame I have of my own videos.
Like I said earlier, however, I really had no intention on bashing or being grumpy. I try my hardest to not bash poor technique, as long as it's being worked on.
Bash away, I do not mind (much).
What deserves bashing, however, is not caring. That is lazy, sloppy, and complacent. That is an unhealthy and even dangerous attitude.
Oh, I do care. But it depends very much on the individual situation how much I care.
If it took a few years to go from beginner to you current results,
From my point of view it was not much different since the first dive.
Had to figure out a lot of things, but that was only details.
Looked horrible sometimes for a while, better at other times, but looks don't count at all.
...I would certainly be seeking a refund on initial training or questioning how I let my initial (good?) training slip.
The training helped a lot.
After some time I started to get more realistic about the relationship between things required and optional for every days dives.
The way I see it formal training gives me the opportunity and perspective to decide what I need for myself.
If you're saying your skills and dedication leave a lot to be desired, how can you be on here saying how great of results you've been achieving?
I did not meet many people locally who could match with effort what I have been doing for fun for years if they tried.
Still not as good as others, but sufficient (and also hard to improve then).
It simply doesn't jive, at all.
I do not like to compare divers on those terms, at all.
TRYING to get back to the original post, the SMS75 and Razor have different purposes....big steels vs neutral tanks. However, only one can accomplish both.
Yes, the Razor, as buttplates are uncomfortable with neutral tanks... Just kidding
they both work.
(that's certainly only my opinion, but it is not an opinion nobody shares)
---------- Post added August 11th, 2014 at 09:37 PM ----------
...That's why authoritative advice (which you seemed to be giving) is such a big deal---and why it's such a big deal to find out that you aren't in a position to be giving authoritative advice at all.
Perhaps it would help if people just did what Steve recommended (and openly offers to everyone for free for a large part) and talked about that instead of personal skill of lesser divers, me perhaps lesser than all of you, but you certainly not comparable to some others as well.