dumpsterDiver
Banned
- Messages
- 9,003
- Reaction score
- 4,652
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
I can reach my valves (single tank or doubles) at all times. I have yet to see someone be able to reach their pony valve. What I think is funny is how ardently people defend "ponies" as I have defined them over the redundant air source I prefer (stage bottle, slung). Why dont you explain that and convince me otherwise.
We keep revisiting how few dives I have. Perhaps I just have learned from the experience of far more capable and experienced divers than are present in this chat thread--maybe their logic in explanations is greater than the logic of the redundant air pony bottle. I mean, isn't that what we like to call education? Why should i learn solely from making mistakes?
You make a lot of assumption. Perhaps you have been taught by some very good divers, but to assume they are better than the people on this thread would be .... another unsubstantiated assumption.
the fact that you beleive that a back mounted pony bottle is inaccesible is evidence of ignorance, maybe not stupidity, but certainly a lack of exposure or even a total lack of self directed critical thinking. Possibly this issue alone will allow you to be a little more open minded about some of these related issues.
I have done thousands of pony dives over the last 30 years and i have never had to turn the valve on my back mounted pony. As was mentioned, if that is a concern then it can EASILY be addressed by mounting the gear in a particular manner.
You supposition that a 40 or even an 80 tank is necesary for redundancy is also indicative of being a little out of touch with normal considerations in recreational diving.
Now if you want me to convince you that a back mounted pony is better than a slung stage bottle, well I probably can not. The stage bottle in front and easily manipulatable is clearly a safer configuration and leaves the diver more options in certain emergency situations. my normal dive buddy wears his like that. However, I do not.
I prefer back mounted for simplicity and primarily because it does not get in my way when i am spearfsihing or catching lobsters. Also, when i DO carry a stage bottle of oxygen (and spearfish) the last thing i need is TWO bottles banging around in front.
Some of these issues come down to convienence, personal preference, desire for streamlined configuration and of course risk tolerance. Some of us happily accept a higher risk in exchange for a simpler cleaner configuration. As long as the person has critically evaluated these considerations and makes those decisions based on fact (rather than what they accept from some scuba god) I see no problem with it.
You seem also to be making a HUGE assumption that good buddy skills are an acceptable means to mitigate risk (and thus negate the utility of a pony bottle). In my opinion, within the recreational dive community, that it a very serious error in judgement. Recreational divers are very frequently getting split up, especially in dirty NJ shipwreck diving.. Certainly buddy separation is more likely than the need for a diver to turn the valve on the back mounted pony bottle.
If you had a few dozen years of experience to draw upon, maybe these conclusions will be as obvious to you as they are to me.
Remember, the goal of scuba is not to be as safe as possible or we would all be diving no deeper that 20 feet and less than 500 yards from shore.