- Messages
- 20,644
- Reaction score
- 15,137
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
@EireDiver606
so in the US we have steel tanks rated at 2640psi/182bar or 3442psi/232. There are some other oddballs, but those are the two available today.
We refer to a "cave fill" as a fill to 3600psi and is a practice that started and continues in cave country in Florida.
There are no 300bar tanks steel tanks in this country.
my comment stemmed from the fact that unless there is a ballast problem *higher pressure tanks are usually more negative which is why I use LP cylinders when cave diving*, or a cost problem, there really isn't any reason not to buy "higher pressure" tanks even if you are always getting short fills
i.e. if the 300bar 15L is say 2kg negative when empty, and the 232bar is 1kg negative when empty, and you always wore more than 2kg of lead then there is no reason to get the 232bar unless it is cost driven
my opinion, others may disagree. In the US, the 2640psi LP cylinders really useless unless you can reliably get "cave fills" in them to 3600psi.
so in the US we have steel tanks rated at 2640psi/182bar or 3442psi/232. There are some other oddballs, but those are the two available today.
We refer to a "cave fill" as a fill to 3600psi and is a practice that started and continues in cave country in Florida.
There are no 300bar tanks steel tanks in this country.
my comment stemmed from the fact that unless there is a ballast problem *higher pressure tanks are usually more negative which is why I use LP cylinders when cave diving*, or a cost problem, there really isn't any reason not to buy "higher pressure" tanks even if you are always getting short fills
i.e. if the 300bar 15L is say 2kg negative when empty, and the 232bar is 1kg negative when empty, and you always wore more than 2kg of lead then there is no reason to get the 232bar unless it is cost driven
my opinion, others may disagree. In the US, the 2640psi LP cylinders really useless unless you can reliably get "cave fills" in them to 3600psi.