missionmtb
Contributor
I feel like this is an image people need to see when they're making the decision on cylinder material, pressure rating, and when and how much to exceed a rating. If you feel like you know enough about metallurgy, quality control, and tolerancing to make that decision I say right on. But I would argue this image illustrates pretty well that material strength and pressure vessel design is not strictly intuitive. Aluminum 3k psi cylinder on the left, not sure what the rating on the steelie on the right is (but it's a modern cylinder).
Cave folks take the risk to overfill their cylinders for a reason, it comes down to logistical feasibility of carrying a given gas volume for a given penetration vs. likelihood of material failure at said pressure from all the reasons a material can fail under load. There are volumes of required gas that are not feasible to carry at rated pressure that become feasible when you exceed the rating by say 40%. If the logistics of your diving are such that you can observe the rating of the cylinder, please do.
Cave folks take the risk to overfill their cylinders for a reason, it comes down to logistical feasibility of carrying a given gas volume for a given penetration vs. likelihood of material failure at said pressure from all the reasons a material can fail under load. There are volumes of required gas that are not feasible to carry at rated pressure that become feasible when you exceed the rating by say 40%. If the logistics of your diving are such that you can observe the rating of the cylinder, please do.