Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Good for you!YES!
Actually it does, that standard has been quoted and referenced in this thread repeatedly.Does that violate PADI standards? NO
Good for you! But to do so you would have to apply for a standards waiver. That's the whole point. Under normal standards PADI Instructors do not have that right. It appears that you are in agreement with what I've been saying.Would I lie about it? NO I would tell them why to their face and document it with PADI.
No they don't, as we have documented in PADI's own words, words that they "smithed."You can play word smith and amateur lawyer all day long but in the end, a PADI instructor has the right and obligation to not certify someone they feel in unsafe.
There is not need, NAUI stadards are MINIMUM standards and anything that they do not restrict you from doing you may do, no "mother-may-I," like PADI. As I observed earlier, that's a double edged sword.Before you ask for direct quotes then please give me DIRECT LINE BY LINE QUOTES from the NAUI manual that say that they have the right to not certify. I have never read a NAUI manual so please enlighten me.
It is not a question of what I like or dislike. I was specifically asked what in PADI Standards prevented me from accepting the standards, and I gave several answers, this requirement is one of them. If answering that question is equivalent to "hatred," so be it, I think it is just pointing out the unacceptable.I am willing to learn but it is obvious that you hate PADI and that is your right but to play word games is not helpful in my opinion.
There you go. If you had been a NAUI instructor you could have withheld certification, and I would not certify anyone that I would no be comfortable having dive as my son's buddy. It appears that we have different values systems.I had one of my first students that passed with flying colors all the required skills and I certified him but I told him due to his attitude that I wouldn't want to dive with him. According to PADI standards I had to certify him and had no justification for not doing so other than he was a jerk.
So, he was a fine diver ... he was just a but-head that you did not like? In that case I would have certified him too. I guess that's why PADI has this rule, in their experience their instructors can be trusted to overlook personal animus? Now, the "power" to not certify that you, your shop owner and your CD are assuming that you, in fact (see earlier standards quotes) does not exist. You gotta worry about an organization that seem to be riddled, all the way to the top, with people you have appear to have not read the standards that they are supposed to abide by.Now if he had exhibited an unsafe, IN MY OPINION - and YES PADI Instructors are actually allowed to use their judgment - then I would not have certified him and my shop owner and Course Director both agreed with me.
Look back at the standards quotes that were posted. Read them and think for a moment. You impression may well be correct, but all that would prove is that you instructor, like so many sounding off in this thread, do not know the standards of the agency that they are supposed to follow. What other standards are they ignorant of?I'm under the impression that my (PADI) instructor would not certify anyone they thought would not be safe ... I know that to mean if they had the right attitude, as many more training sessions as needed ... and I think also dropping them from his class if he thought their attitude would not allow them to be a safe diver.
Yes PADI defines mastery as someting well south of what I (or a dictionary) would use as a definition: "During the Confined Water Dives, mastery is defined as performing the skill so it meets the stated performance requirements in a reasonably comfortable, fluid, repeatable manner as would be expected of an Open Water Diver." Doesn't give you a whole lot of room to claim a lack of mastery, does it?Do the PADI standards define mastery? If not, is it therefore open to instructor discretion?
I don't think that you have to take any and all students, but once enrolled in the class, if they exhibit "PADI Mastery," then you must certify them (or, I assume, apply for a Standards Waiver).are you saying that a PADI instructor has to take and train anyone to completion that signs up and pays for a class ? because I would think the instructor can decide who he teaches to certification
"Just enrolled" fair enough ... the standards do talk about having of issue a cert. if they meet all standards. Tossing them out of class before that happens is, I guess, an alternative.just enrolled? .. I would think that they would have to complete the class .. and if that person has an unsafe attitude, the instructor would find that out before completion and he could drop them from class and not have to certify them
and ... "as would be expected of an Open Water Diver" ... are those expectations spelled out also? because that seems to be a way to impose reasonable expectations on your student
The point is that it is not a 'NAUI" class that your husband teaches, it is a class that meets NAUI minimum standards AND that meets what your husband feels is required for the particular situation. NAUI trusts his judgment on the matter. There, in my mind, is the key difference between the agencies.very interesting replies..my hubby is a cert. instructor for PADI,NAUI,TDI and HSA...