Anyone can checkNo, if the shop doesn't do PADI they can't check. At least it used to be that way.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Anyone can checkNo, if the shop doesn't do PADI they can't check. At least it used to be that way.
Anyone can check
Serious questions:
1. How do non-pro divers imagine that PADI earns revenue as a business?
2. What do non-pro divers imagine are PADI's operating costs and overheads?
3. How do non-pro divers imagine the relationship between PADI, dive centers and instructors?
1. That's what gets me. The processing fee to PADI for a new cert and card is about half of what a replacement card cost.1. Certification fees, primarily. I don't think replacing lost cert cards should be one; card replacement should be at (at most) cost, IMO.
2. Administrative overhead, insurance and legal costs; maybe some research on injuries and deaths.
3. Monitoring and (hopefully) enforcing standards. When I got my AOW, PADI sent me a questionnaire that asked about the course, including exactly what we did. One that sticks in my mind was that they asked if our deep dive was to a max of 100', to which I answered no, we went to 102.
1. That's what gets me. The processing fee to PADI for a new cert and card is about half of what a replacement card cost.
Lastly, PADI doesn't force anyone to replace cards. In fact, all PADI operations can use dive check to verify certification if someone forgets their card, so ..... if you don't want to spend the money you don't have to.
My point is, don't demonize a company for earning profit because you think the price is to high. You have done your part by choosing SDI instead. Once the price reaches an unfair level, so will the majority, and the price will correct. That is their business model - it is meant to make money, and it will work for them (or not).
What I meant is, that you literally have to be with PADI to work in some regions as they practically have a monopoly in some places. That's a advantage if you will. For people who don't wanna work, there is no advantage in getting padi training.
Serious questions:
1. How do non-pro divers imagine that PADI earns revenue as a business?
2. What do non-pro divers imagine are PADI's operating costs and overheads?
3. How do non-pro divers imagine the relationship between PADI, dive centers and instructors?
Huh? No it's not. The bottling plant has actual cost. Padi already makes their money by selling overpriced books, membership fees, worthless specialty course for boat diving and such. A bottle of beer or water has actual value... the membership and the card doesn't. Training itself has value, but that's direcly paid for when you take it.
Eitherway, I would not recommend PADI on anyone, unless they wanna be a freelance instructor in Thailand or something of that sort. PADI has advatanges but not for people who dive as a hobby.
1. Certification fees, primarily. I don't think replacing lost cert cards should be one; card replacement should be at (at most) cost, IMO.
2. Administrative overhead, insurance and legal costs; maybe some research on injuries and deaths.
3. Monitoring and (hopefully) enforcing standards. When I got my AOW, PADI sent me a questionnaire that asked about the course, including exactly what we did. One that sticks in my mind was that they asked if our deep dive was to a max of 100', to which I answered no, we went to 102.