Originally posted by roakey
Exactly, you get the right equipment to do the job correctly.
Of course only as defined in Rule #2!
"If it ain't used by Roak...
It must be broke!"
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Originally posted by roakey
Exactly, you get the right equipment to do the job correctly.
So you dont want to have the optimal setup for your gear? You need it whether you know it or not.junior wings. However, you have given me no compelling reason to spend another $250+ for something I really don't need or want.
No eccentricities, the proper sized wing behaves the same for doubles or singles.My system works more than fine for me, and I think I will keep it. I am quite comfortable with the setup that I have, and I don't have to get used to the eccentricities of two different wings.
Junior wings are not Halcyon. And it appears that you are bashing a product without having tried it. In other words you have not dove with the correct sized wing for singles. This is a point of contention that you keep getting upset about.Minimalism has it's merits, but I prefer maximum safety. Perhaps when I win the lottery I will purchase each wing offered by Halcyon and learn the relative merits of each one.
The question was not how to use a wing with a single tank. It was the merits of using the proper sized wing versus using an oversized wing and extra gear. You did not clearly articulate the merits of having extra gear to offset the selection of the wrong piece of equipment. You think that because it has no moving parts or failure points that it is okay. My question is why bring it when there is a more optimal solution. Diving is not a contest to see who can hang the most crap on their rig.I have answered the initial question as to how to use a wing with a single tank. I did it simply, without adding any additional failure points or task loading. I would love to hear how you would propose to solve this dilemma without purchasing another wing.