Reading the definition I am not sure I can entirely discount the findings, especially given the “average diver.” I tend to think of contact as either consciously done, grabbing coral/sponge, or unintentional, as in kicking over coral/sponge. Something that causes obvious insult to the reef. And yes, dangling gear is a problem.Ah, thanks for the primary literature. I can track the details down.
"Taking the mean values from both the shore and boat dives, kicking and touching the reef substrate with fins was by far the most common form of contact(81.4%), followed by touching and holding with hands(10.1%). Most contacts (79.8%) caused minor damage(touch or scrape), almost half (49.0%) resulted in there-suspension of sediment, and a small proportion(4.1%) caused major damage, i.e. caused breakage. Fin kicks accounted for the greatest proportion of each type of contact: 95.2% (n¼138) of major damage,78.5% (n¼2228) of minor damage, and 90.8%(n¼1581) of re-suspended sediment. Divers holding onto the substrate with their hands and resting against the substrate with their knees were the next most problematic actions, followed by loose, dangling equipment (gauges and alternative air sources ‘octo-puses’) which brushed against and knocked into the reef."
But yes, if you look at all the incidental touches I am sure it all does add up. Carefully placing a finger to adjust momentum/trajectory, fin tips that brush soft coral. A hand that slides past some fire coral. But not sure that this approach gives the best reflection of our impact on the reef.