Webster defines oaf as:
1: a stupid person
I don't know where Webster gets its definition from, as it doesn't correspond with what I have always understood the word to mean. I don't have an Oxford dictionary with me or I would look it up there.
Anyway, if I had meant "stupid" that is the word I would have used. I meant uncultured, coarse, belligerent ..... someone I have no desire to be anywhere near. Please don't manipulate and then deliberately mis-interpret the words I used.
If you mean by "predetermined opinion" that I went to the meeting already convinced I wouldn't want to hear him then that is the exact opposite of my position. I had never seen or heard him before but knew he had strong views and wasn't afraid of expressing them, and I wanted to hear those views. I expected to learn from them.
However, when he cut into another speaker in mid sentence that didn't bode well, and when what came out of his mouth could in no way be construed as a constructive contribution to the debate, but was merely foul-mouthed personal invective directed against the speaker he had interrupted, I switched off. As I said before, in any normal debating environment he would not have been allowed to continue but would have been silenced, and then if (when) he continued, ejected.
Perhaps I would have ignored the "profanity" and learned from the knowledge, but on that occasion (the only occasion I have ever heard him) there WAS no knowledge, just invective. (I don't recall any profanity)
They say that first impressions count most. This one certainly did. I have little doubt that George Irvine has accomplished a lot in his diving career, and I haven't said anything to detract from his achievement. I merely described his behaviour on the only occasion I have ever been near him, and said that that behaviour did not encourage me to listen to him on any future occasion. He is his own worst ambassador.