I don't see how it's being "disingenuous" . You're splitting hairs here. You basically replaced the word stupid with idiot.
Idiot (as defined by the dictionary you quoted)-
Stupid-
Neither of these describe George Irvine, and my original post is still valid.
I wasn't aware that I had used either of these words. You introduced both of them.
And as to "Deepstops" comment on my command of the English language, I think the evidence suggests otherwise.
Anyway, I'm tired of bandying semantics. I found GI's behaviour unacceptable and I know others share my view, which does not predispose us to listen in any detail to his views. My view only. You and others may disagree - fine. But you won't persuade me.