cowboyneal:Wrong - gloves don't prevent anything, except effective injury prevention. How about we ban gloves on dry suits too? I say BOYCOTT any area that doesn't allow divers to make their own exposure protection choices, You'll see the tune change once the dollars stop pouring in. What's next? No wetsuits? In over 25 years of diving, this is my first coral injury, and this was only the SECOND time I dove without gloves (and only because I didn't want to have the argument on the boat). From now on I put them on at depth and take them off on ascent (if I go to any of these places at all). Let's ban hoods too while we're at it! Ridiculous.
Anyway, it was definitely Millepora. It doesn't really hurt anymore, its just damn ugly...the welts are just red, raised and look like blisters...small children are scared by the sight of my hand...the horror...the horror...the horror....lol....
I agree with neal, effective training and enforcement would go a lot further than something that compromises the safety of divers.
The issue of not touching coral or wildlife should be part of the dive briefing. But to suggest that divers should be put at risk of injury in the case of a mishap where then brush against something accidently pretty much flies in the face of our training.
I'm certainly sensitive to ecological damage and like everyone else here, I have witnessed people who intentionally destroy reef life at depth by grabbing it or poking it or touching it. But oddly, in practically all those cases, those people were not wearing gloves anyway.
I've also seen far more damage come from dangling hoses and other equipment and poor buoyancy control. That is where a divemaster or instructor should step in either work with these folks or prevent them from diving to sensitive areas.
Proper training and briefing will be more effective than a ban on equipment.
Jeff