- Messages
- 20,648
- Reaction score
- 15,146
- # of dives
- I'm a Fish!
Paul is a good friend of mine, and was made aware of the what was being said about him long before that dinner picture was taken, and LONG before anything was sent to the agencies.
Now, I have not actually seen the list, I did not compile it and actually stayed mostly out of those conversations. For the reasons you state, that list can't be made public because with no proof positive evidence on most of it, it is all hearsay. Publishing it would be irresponsible. The list was compiled because of the statements made by the TD's of two rather important agencies and the statements made were very elitist. Unfortunately they were unaware of the actual state of their training corps. So, when everything was sent to the it was "look, this is what is being said about these instructors *where applicable personal observations were made*, and you guys need to really look inwards to make sure you can make these claims". That is all it was, there was never any intention of getting those accused of standards violations because the vast majority weren't accused of standards violations, much was just "they're getting lazy and it shows" or something similar to that. You will never see that list unless you are on the board of those agencies and nor should you.
I don't want to see the list, I have no reason to because it doesn't effect me, and since I didn't compile it, it isn't my business. All that matters is that the agencies are made aware of what others are saying about people their instructors so they can do something about it. We all know at least 3/4 instructors that are on the list and it may be different instructors, it doesn't take much effort to bring it out. What is important is that the NACD and CDS take that list and do something about it so they can actually make the claim that we are the elite cave training agencies, that is all that matters. The names on the list don't matter, you could just put a number next to each name and it would have the same point. You aren't as good as you claim you are, either stop making the claim, or get better so you can make that claim.
Now, I have not actually seen the list, I did not compile it and actually stayed mostly out of those conversations. For the reasons you state, that list can't be made public because with no proof positive evidence on most of it, it is all hearsay. Publishing it would be irresponsible. The list was compiled because of the statements made by the TD's of two rather important agencies and the statements made were very elitist. Unfortunately they were unaware of the actual state of their training corps. So, when everything was sent to the it was "look, this is what is being said about these instructors *where applicable personal observations were made*, and you guys need to really look inwards to make sure you can make these claims". That is all it was, there was never any intention of getting those accused of standards violations because the vast majority weren't accused of standards violations, much was just "they're getting lazy and it shows" or something similar to that. You will never see that list unless you are on the board of those agencies and nor should you.
I don't want to see the list, I have no reason to because it doesn't effect me, and since I didn't compile it, it isn't my business. All that matters is that the agencies are made aware of what others are saying about people their instructors so they can do something about it. We all know at least 3/4 instructors that are on the list and it may be different instructors, it doesn't take much effort to bring it out. What is important is that the NACD and CDS take that list and do something about it so they can actually make the claim that we are the elite cave training agencies, that is all that matters. The names on the list don't matter, you could just put a number next to each name and it would have the same point. You aren't as good as you claim you are, either stop making the claim, or get better so you can make that claim.