Mk5 possible devil spring?

[L13]

Well, I suppose Mark74 has a point except that I think his questions were fully answered, early on. Maybe we should have taken another thread. Esoteric arguments like these can certainly remain civil and this one has, I think, and entertaining and educational.

Perhaps a mod could split the thread please? How can get a mod to do that?

I reported your post, to get it considered.

 

[John C. Ratliff]

If you still don't have the study, pm me, I could send it to you.

I still do not have that particular study, and would appreciate seeing in in a PM.

Thank you!

SeaRat

 

[John C. Ratliff]

At the request of Mr. Ratliff, who has done it privately, I delete my two JOKES from the post, I consider it censorship and I delete it for not creating controversy. They have contaminated a post that I opened about the damn mk5 spring talking about the navy experiments and the flow rates of the ******* fifth port, THEN OPEN ANOTHER SEPARATE AND DON'T CONTAMINATE MINE. I am deeply disappointed with the hypocritical, arrogant and puritanical attitude of some of you. I WILL NOT INTERVENE IN THIS FORUM AGAIN DIVE MORE AND TYPE LESS MARK74 ACTIVE SATURATION OVERALL

Mark74,

The specific post I asked you about was an image with a word that did not fit in with the discussion. I felt it was a rather poor choice here, so I PMed you about it. It did not come across as a joke, unfortunately. I do hope you will stay here, and continue to contribute, which is why I did this as a PM.

John (SeaRat)

 

[MARK74]

Mark74,

The specific post I asked you about was an image with a word that did not fit in with the discussion. I felt it was a rather poor choice here, so I PMed you about it. It did not come across as a joke, unfortunately. I do hope you will stay here, and continue to contribute, which is why I did this as a PM.

John (SeaRat)

Juan, if that was your intention, I appreciate it, mine was just to add a bit of humor, which apparently was not well received, I only ask that the next time you try to warn me of something, be more concise, because if not, sounds like an imposition. Thank you for your explanation and also to Angelo and Nimrod for their words. It is not necessary to divide the post, let it continue as it is, but thanks for the intention. Greetings

 

[John C. Ratliff]

Thomas, also known on here as "Axxel57" who is somewhere in Central Europe, sent the Navy EDU document to me as a download. If any of you want to get access to this document, "Evaluation of Commercially Available Open Circuit Scuba Regulators," by James R. Middleton, March 1980, need only to PM me with their e-mail and I'll give you access to it. It is currently in my Google Drive, and too large to be sent easily, or posted here. This document also answers some of the questions that have come up in this forum about regulator performance. Here are two pages of this document:

SeaRat