Spencer-Tucker Constant Pressure Mistral Air Delivery System (STCPMADS)

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Scuba Lawyer

Contributor
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
3,209
Location
Laguna Beach, California
# of dives
5000 - ∞
Spencer-Tucker Constant Pressure Mistral Air Delivery System (STCPMADS)

So I’m swimming into the beach from a dive the other day. My regulator is my trusty 1958 US Diver’s single-stage Mistral. My tank pressure is down to 500psi and the reg is breathing fantastically because, being an upstream design, the lower the tank pressure, the less force needed for the main diaphragm to push down on the oversize levers, push on the pin, and provide a supply of air. I only wished I could have that same ease of breathing at the beginning of the dive on a full tank as well as at the end on a tank with 500psi left.

As I’m taking my fins off and walking toward the beach a lightbulb goes off in my brain. I am sure I’m not the first to think of this, but I hadn’t heard of it before. Anyway, why not have a first stage regulator that supplies a constant IP of 500 psi leading to the single stage Mistral? That way I get the Mistral’s famous ease of breathing at lower tank pressure throughout the dive using its giant levers. Yes, I know that this actually makes it a two-stage regulator but that’s not the point. As many of us know, even with a balanced DH regulator the 2nd stage lever is smaller than in a single stage reg and doesn’t have the advantage of a fulcrum point to make things easier as in a single stage reg.

Next I called Luis and said ok, what 1st stage single hose reg will get me an IP of 500 psi? Luis said none that he was aware of. He was correct. So next I call BT and describe my plan to him. We both actually start doing some experimenting to see how high a stable IP we can get with a scuba 1st stage. The answer is not very high. I managed to get an old Poseidon 1st stage up to 200 psi and Bill slightly less. Most were around 150-160psi max even with shims in a piston reg. However, the Mistral does not fare very well at such very low standard IP’s. The Mistral needs a minimum of 500 psi input to actually function well. Luis is always right! Back to the drawing board.

Contemporaneously Bill and I came up with the idea of using an air regulator that is used on compressors. I was thinking that many of us have bench test regs with adjustable IP. August Industries sells them. The input can be has high as 6000 psi and the IP set and locked to any pressure including 500 psi. Bill used what I believe is an unbalanced reg and I plan on using a balanced one. It really makes no difference because even on the unbalanced reg the IP swing is only about a 100 psi from full tank to a low on air tank. Easy for a Mistral to handle.

I put together a parts list as follows.

aNIi3b.jpg


From my original design we dumped the Shrader valve as unnecessary and potentially a source of air constriction. My thought was to put a hose (that would tolerate 500 psi) between the reg and the yoke to the Mistral. Everything uses 1/4" npt threads.

B1t8HT.jpg


Here is what Bill came up with initially using a hose. Testing showed .4 inches on the Magnahelic. Awesome!

6KKJj7.jpg


That idea got dumped in favor of an all-in-one-unit that Bill built.

TxM4dC.jpg

Ug5BoY.jpg

aWgIqn.jpg

CwJfm8.jpg

LWd14a.jpg

YQvNOb.jpg


The Mistral sits slightly high and to the left but fits comfortably against the back. Bill took it 9 feet down in the pool and said it worked great! I plan on having mine on a set of twin 38's so I am working on plumbing the yoke downward and directly below the center tank valve.

Anyway, a fun project. I’ll let Bill chime in with his more knowledgeable test-bench jargon. :)

M
 
Rube Goldberg is smiling from beyond.
 
I've always liked Bill's thought process & problem solving skills.

Interesting little project.

I'd have put a tee in at the yoke to put (sacrilege) a HP monitoring point... :stirpot:

(I know, there is a port on that valve, and it is a j)
 
Rather then using a yoke style valve, get an old Sherwood 6300 DIN valve, the slant style, it is offset too, which may make the Reg line up a tad better. Just a thought.

But cool idea. Wasn't ease of breathing why Cousteau chest mounted his DH regs?
 
I need one of those so I can use my Mistrals on my HP 100's
 
I need one of those so I can use my Mistrals on my HP 100's
It would work. Might need a beefier yoke on the 1st stage side. 😎
 
I had been eyeballing a Mistral for some time, but always hesitated because of the tanks and pressures I use... This could be a slippery slope for me... Allan had one for sale...
 
Mark,

That is friggin' awesome. Now can you design one that will work for my Voit 50 fathom, a downstream single stage double hose, that breathes easiest around 2,000 PSI. Maybe with a reverse engineered Spencer - Tucker valve it can maintain its 2K intermediate pressure indefinitely, and I can dive forever on a single fill. :eyebrow:
 
Mark,

That is friggin' awesome. Now can you design one that will work for my Voit 50 fathom, a downstream single stage double hose, that breathes easiest around 2,000 PSI. Maybe with a reverse engineered Spencer - Tucker valve it can maintain its 2K intermediate pressure indefinitely, and I can dive forever on a single fill. :eyebrow:
Sure, no problem. Just figure out a way to install a tiny nuclear booster pump that osmotically extracts air from the surrounding water column then compresses it to 2000 psi on every breath. I'll get Bill on that immediately! 😎

M
 

Back
Top Bottom