JJCCR Exhale lung OPV alternative?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

So, you must throw away your drysuit's OPV.
Waiting until the OPV decides to dump a random amount of gas from a very full & buoyant drysuit seems like a way to have a very rocky BO ascent.:wink:
You can be serious about it, right?

Buoyancy control is a proactive action, it is a lot like reefing sails, braking before entering a corner, covering your mouth before sneezing, or pulling down your pants before pooping. You do all those things before the main act.

The example of uncontrolled ascend due to a stuck OPV says a lot more about the diver's skills and the pre-dive procedure than about rebreather design.
 
I have had units with the adjustable drysuit style dump and always kept them cranked closed as them would leak at inopportune times resulting in a buoyancy shift I wasn't expecting.
I have installed pull cord dumps on all of my current units and prefer that style.
 
So, you must throw away your drysuit's OPV.
Waiting until the OPV decides to dump a random amount of gas from a very full & buoyant drysuit seems like a way to have a very rocky BO ascent.:wink:
People don't wait for their suit to fill up like a balloon before venting as an OPV - unless they are corking uncontrolled to the surface
 
People don't wait for their suit to fill up like a balloon before venting as an OPV - unless they are corking uncontrolled to the surface
IMHO - people don't wait for their CLs or suit to fill up like a balloon.
Automatic drysuit OPVs lessens operational load during ascent.
Pull-style OPVs adding inevitable things to avoud uncontrolled ascent.
Me prefers less operational load.
 
IMHO - people don't wait for their CLs or suit to fill up like a balloon.
Automatic drysuit OPVs lessens operational load during ascent.
Pull-style OPVs adding inevitable things to avoud uncontrolled ascent.
Me prefers less operational load.
OPV = OVER pressure valve. It's only going to vent when the CLs are full
 
I think the OP might be talking about options under bailout scenarios, like being able to just tilt-dump hands-free, rather than pull a [possibly missing] cord, or manually vent a closed bailed out loop?
Correct.
Thats exactly what im asking. Thanks!
 
IMHO - people don't wait for their CLs or suit to fill up like a balloon.
Automatic drysuit OPVs lessens operational load during ascent.
Pull-style OPVs adding inevitable things to avoud uncontrolled ascent.
Me prefers less operational load.
I agree. I think operational load or task loading is underestimated as risk and I think mitigating this by doing robust automation is one way of freeing up "RAM" for problem solving during an emergency.
 
I have had units with the adjustable drysuit style dump and always kept them cranked closed as them would leak at inopportune times resulting in a buoyancy shift I wasn't expecting.
I have installed pull cord dumps on all of my current units and prefer that style.
That is interesting and very useful info to me. I haven't had the opportunity to talk to anyone using the adjustable opv. I was wondering excactly how useful they are during "real" diving. Would you say the leaking is due to a malfunctioning opv or just the nature of the design, that it is hard to set the correct release pressure?
 

Back
Top Bottom