Peter Slater
Registered
Is this an issue with all steel tanks or just older ones? I just bought a set of new steel tanks and would hate to have them condemned.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Is this an issue with all steel tanks or just older ones? I just bought a set of new steel tanks and would hate to have them condemned.
LP or HP? HDG or Painted? (HDG = Hot Dipped Galvanized)
The LP tanks are the ones at "issue". The "new" Faber HDG tanks do not seem to be a "problem", the XS/Worthingtons from 4 to 6 years ago are the "problem"...
YMMV
I have heard that the hot dip galvanizing is the issue, the painted Fabers of recent years haven't had issues. The "new" Faber hot dipped tanks likely haven't needed a hydro yet, wonder if they will need same test procedure when they start becoming due?
LP or HP? HDG or Painted? (HDG = Hot Dipped Galvanized)
The LP tanks are the ones at "issue". The "new" Faber HDG tanks do not seem to be a "problem", the XS/Worthingtons from 4 to 6 years ago are the "problem"...
YMMV
The HDG problem with related pretest round out advisories goes all the way back to the PSTs of the late 1990s.LP or HP? HDG or Painted? (HDG = Hot Dipped Galvanized)
The LP tanks are the ones at "issue". The "new" Faber HDG tanks do not seem to be a "problem", the XS/Worthingtons from 4 to 6 years ago are the "problem"...
YMMV
No, it is not related to the shape when manufactured. It is related to the zinc bonded layer changing the expansion properties of the bi-metal cylinder versus steel alone.
The support page at XS Scuba contains multiple documents and a video with an explanation of the Worthington testing issue. Skip ahead to 3:30 if you don’t want to watch the whole thing.
Changes to the hydro retest — XS Scuba