OP
dennisgrimm
Registered
nyresq:
Like i have just mentioned, I am leaning towards diving with my isolator open. In fact, I just removed my second SPG and will be doing my next dives with the iso opened a bit. However, I will again play the devil's advocate and argue the other side.
First, we both know that a neck o-ring failure can happen but is very unlikely. Second, diving independants you would only use 1/3 of your first tank before switching to your second tank. Then you would use 2/3 of your second tank and switch back to your first. You would then complete your dive on your first tank with 1/3 remaining in both. This is the method of diving independants that was taught to me. So, in your scenario if a failure occured at the first switch you would still have 1/3 of your total gas remaining and you would would only be 1/4 into your dive. Not a problem. Following the above outlined procedure, the worst case scenario would be to have a failure like you described at your turn around point. You would have used 1/3 of your first tank and 1/3 of your second tank and would have 1/3 of your total gas supply still remaining after losing a tank (either). Again, no problem and you are not too worried at this point because you didn't have to close your isolator (already done) and you know you have 1/3 to get out. Make sense?
Think that is bad? The above mentioned worst case scenario is even worse with an isolator open. Follow me here... you are at your turn around point and have consumed 1/3 of your total gas. You lose a neck o-ring and quickly shut down your isolator. One tank is toast and you now have less than 1/3 of your gas supply remaining because you have lost a bit of gas in the process of shutting down the isolator. How much you lose will depend on how quick you can shut your isolator down and that will depend on what you are doing at the time of failure. On top of that your SAC rate will be up (mine would be anyway) because you just had to close your isolator and your leaking post to discover that it is still leaking.
The point is, don't lose a neck o-ring at the turn around point. ut:
The downside of using independant is the associated task loading and extra equipment all of the time and the benefit is the possible reduced task loading durning an emergency. Proper gas managment should allow you to have enough gas in either situation.
Like i have just mentioned, I am leaning towards diving with my isolator open. In fact, I just removed my second SPG and will be doing my next dives with the iso opened a bit. However, I will again play the devil's advocate and argue the other side.
First, we both know that a neck o-ring failure can happen but is very unlikely. Second, diving independants you would only use 1/3 of your first tank before switching to your second tank. Then you would use 2/3 of your second tank and switch back to your first. You would then complete your dive on your first tank with 1/3 remaining in both. This is the method of diving independants that was taught to me. So, in your scenario if a failure occured at the first switch you would still have 1/3 of your total gas remaining and you would would only be 1/4 into your dive. Not a problem. Following the above outlined procedure, the worst case scenario would be to have a failure like you described at your turn around point. You would have used 1/3 of your first tank and 1/3 of your second tank and would have 1/3 of your total gas supply still remaining after losing a tank (either). Again, no problem and you are not too worried at this point because you didn't have to close your isolator (already done) and you know you have 1/3 to get out. Make sense?
Think that is bad? The above mentioned worst case scenario is even worse with an isolator open. Follow me here... you are at your turn around point and have consumed 1/3 of your total gas. You lose a neck o-ring and quickly shut down your isolator. One tank is toast and you now have less than 1/3 of your gas supply remaining because you have lost a bit of gas in the process of shutting down the isolator. How much you lose will depend on how quick you can shut your isolator down and that will depend on what you are doing at the time of failure. On top of that your SAC rate will be up (mine would be anyway) because you just had to close your isolator and your leaking post to discover that it is still leaking.
The point is, don't lose a neck o-ring at the turn around point. ut:
The downside of using independant is the associated task loading and extra equipment all of the time and the benefit is the possible reduced task loading durning an emergency. Proper gas managment should allow you to have enough gas in either situation.