Question Do we need environment sealed first stages ?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

An excellent reason to use scubapro, I find their parts availability pretty amazing over the long haul for parts that are likely to need replacement, aqualung first stages are even better for longevity of service kits.
I heard Aqualung is a little iffy right now with the whole drama happening. Great stuff but if they go belly up they will become paper weights. But then again I'm getting all this info from scubaboard, and we know SB is mythology land so maybe AL is just fine, IDK?
I do know my dive shop has been waiting for AL parts and products for months now without so much as a peep.
Scubapro, yes, rock solid. That's one thing they got right, keep producing parts very long term.
 
Aqualung is a little iffy right now

"little iffy"?? Just "little"? lol

From what I read here and heard around from sources in EU and US, it is as serious as can be for an international company. Pretty serious shiiit.
 
I have several unsealed piston regs that are over 40 years old. At least, I think they are; I’ve had most of them more than 20 years and they were old when I bought them. At some point I will have to retire my MK15s because I’ll run out of seats, but the MK5s and 10s will certainly last longer than I will.
He conceded the average diver can't make a Mk25 last 40 years. :)

I can't argue against Rob, with so many customer regs that land on his table...
 
He conceded the average diver can't make a Mk25 last 40 years. :)

I can't argue against Rob, with so many customer regs that land on his table...

With Rob around to work on regulators, I expect him to make them last 50 years or more.
 
The secret isn’t how long a regulator will last in a box but while attached to a tank and doing what it’s supposed to do.
I use my 40 year old piston 1st stages all the time, in caves, on both my main tanks and stages. My O2 reg is a little newer; a 25 year old MK2. But, I take care of them, soak them in fresh water after salt water use, and I (hope) my fills are pretty reliably clean. Plus, the cave water is pretty clean, sometimes things get silted out in the tight spots, but generally clean water. Very hard, though.

I did buy a set of older MK25s that are probably around 20 years old (maybe I could look it up) to replace my soon-to-be decommissioned MK15s. Those are the newest I have, but I’m sure I all my 1st stages will long outlast my ability to dive.

Rob is, of course, very knowledgeable and generous with his knowledge. My experience with unsealed piston regs has been generally very positive and I have absolutely no need to use sealed regulators. I’ve seen some pretty corroded ones but with proper care, I just don’t get the type of wear he’s talking about.
 
I love to bash Scubapro. They're the 800# gorilla. But of course, in the real world, their engineering and manufacturing techniques are superior. I have some qualms about their QC, as most of the regs I've purchased new in the past few years for teaching material have been poorly adjusted.
Mk25, Mk19EVO x2, Mk11, D420 x3, S270 ‐ only one of these new purchases (Mk11) was ready to dive. But if the shops adjust them before they go out the door? No problem.
Yeah, in the floaty grit world of beach diving, I'm a little hyper-aware of trapped grit at the piston head o-ring. But also yeah, @happy-diver is right: you can keep a piston sealed at 135 psi over all sorts of cobblestone corrosion, with or without polishing the seal. But if they'd all been sealed with messy goop they'd still be pristine. Except...messy goop.
Here's why I keep harping on this and stirring you guys up. I'm not so focused on those awful examples whose pics I keep posting every year. They're just 20 regs over all these years whose pictures I keep because they show the problem, from minor beginning to awful end.
No, what breaks my heart is the customer who I eventually sold a Mk19EVO to, when his UNsealed Atomic B2 died after a decade. He lived in the tropics; he owned a resort; he was a 0/10 when it came to preventive maintenance.
Things were pretty filled with verdigris the first service. But a little time in the ultrasonic cleaned him right up. Two years later, he sent the same thing back to me (now at about 10 years total reg age). Now, the ambient holes were bubbling every five seconds or so. Just a tiny bubble.
A quick polish to the piston head seal and a new HP oring and it was still happening. It was slow enough that you could actually tell by tilting the reg underwater that the air was coming from the piston head side.
So I started to polish the piston head sealing area in the body again with a little 8,000 grit Micromesh, and decided to look under the microscope. The area was filled with pits that propagated under the chrome. When you polished to the bottom of one microscopic scratch, a whole array of gaps opened up. I could not fix this short of replacing the body (which I did when he left the reg with me in trade for a new Mk19EVO).
Un-rinsed salt crystals (and coral debris?), scratching the reg at every first pressurization, had worn through the chrome in microscopic areas in the space of a few years. Continued neglect after my first gentle scolding (because life and business just got in the way of attention to his gear) continued the corrosion until the reg was toast within a decade.

So I'm a guy that wants a valve to work forever, if the only parts rubbing against each other are chrome against rubber. When a design allows the accumulation of crystalline debris at a critical seal, I'm offended. If you can fix it with an overnight soak in the sink and a good flush, you can make it work for 50 years. But the average diver does a marginal job of that, and that's how I get my pictures, as well as an excuse to stir the pot here on SB.

From a purist's POV, an unsealed piston in salt water is planned deterioration. But if you don't look for a problem, you won't find one. These toys are pretty robust, and how many divers check their gear with an IP gauge and submerged observation every year?

So for every OP that posts, "Do we really need a $60 Christo-lube fill?", I'll say "Heck, yes!"
And all my friends here on Scubaboard will say, "Naw!". And we're both right. Just depends on your POV.
:stirpot:
 
I love to bash Scubapro. They're the 800# gorilla. But of course, in the real world, their engineering and manufacturing techniques are superior. I have some qualms about their QC, as most of the regs I've purchased new in the past few years for teaching material have been poorly adjusted.
Mk25, Mk19EVO x2, Mk11, D420 x3, S270 ‐ only one of these new purchases (Mk11) was ready to dive. But if the shops adjust them before they go out the door? No problem.
Yeah, in the floaty grit world of beach diving, I'm a little hyper-aware of trapped grit at the piston head o-ring. But also yeah, @happy-diver is right: you can keep a piston sealed at 135 psi over all sorts of cobblestone corrosion, with or without polishing the seal. But if they'd all been sealed with messy goop they'd still be pristine. Except...messy goop.
Here's why I keep harping on this and stirring you guys up. I'm not so focused on those awful examples whose pics I keep posting every year. They're just 20 regs over all these years whose pictures I keep because they show the problem, from minor beginning to awful end.
No, what breaks my heart is the customer who I eventually sold a Mk19EVO to, when his UNsealed Atomic B2 died after a decade. He lived in the tropics; he owned a resort; he was a 0/10 when it came to preventive maintenance.
Things were pretty filled with verdigris the first service. But a little time in the ultrasonic cleaned him right up. Two years later, he sent the same thing back to me (now at about 10 years total reg age). Now, the ambient holes were bubbling every five seconds or so. Just a tiny bubble.
A quick polish to the piston head seal and a new HP oring and it was still happening. It was slow enough that you could actually tell by tilting the reg underwater that the air was coming from the piston head side.
So I started to polish the piston head sealing area in the body again with a little 8,000 grit Micromesh, and decided to look under the microscope. The area was filled with pits that propagated under the chrome. When you polished to the bottom of one microscopic scratch, a whole array of gaps opened up. I could not fix this short of replacing the body (which I did when he left the reg with me in trade for a new Mk19EVO).
Un-rinsed salt crystals (and coral debris?), scratching the reg at every first pressurization, had worn through the chrome in microscopic areas in the space of a few years. Continued neglect after my first gentle scolding (because life and business just got in the way of attention to his gear) continued the corrosion until the reg was toast within a decade.

So I'm a guy that wants a valve to work forever, if the only parts rubbing against each other are chrome against rubber. When a design allows the accumulation of crystalline debris at a critical seal, I'm offended. If you can fix it with an overnight soak in the sink and a good flush, you can make it work for 50 years. But the average diver does a marginal job of that, and that's how I get my pictures, as well as an excuse to stir the pot here on SB.

From a purist's POV, an unsealed piston in salt water is planned deterioration. But if you don't look for a problem, you won't find one. These toys are pretty robust, and how many divers check their gear with an IP gauge and submerged observation every year?

So for every OP that posts, "Do we really need a $60 Christo-lube fill?", I'll say "Heck, yes!"
And all my friends here on Scubaboard will say, "Naw!". And we're both right. Just depends on your POV.
:stirpot:

He had ten years of service with a most shocking lack of attention and a complete absence of any preventative maintenance. Both he and the regulator have done exceptionally well considering the circumstances. I see it as a testament to how much abuse the Atomic regulator can take before it breaks down.

All that the MK25, or the unsealed Atomic first stage, needs is a dip in fresh water after use, that's all. We aren't talking about anything major here.

With utmost respect, I don't agree with you on this matter at all, not even remotely :)
 

Back
Top Bottom