Question Do we need environment sealed first stages ?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I thought you'd never ask!
I see it's time for the annual posting of my favorite unsealed piston pictures.
View attachment 877441View attachment 877442View attachment 877443View attachment 877445View attachment 877446
You cannot make an unsealed piston last 40 years. Some won't last 15. When Scubapro abandoned SPEC boots, they condemned their piston customers to buying a new reg before they might otherwise have needed. Which was the point, after all.

Piston reg?
Sealed Atomic or dry Sherwood.
I won't dive a Mk25.
My mk10 is now 30 yrs and going strong. From ice diving to tropical trips.
 
So I'm a guy that wants a valve to work forever, if the only parts rubbing against each other are chrome against rubber. When a design allows the accumulation of crystalline debris at a critical seal, I'm offended. If you can fix it with an overnight soak in the sink and a good flush, you can make it work for 50 years. But the average diver does a marginal job of that, and that's how I get my pictures, as well as an excuse to stir the pot here on SB.
Wow, 10 years was a short service life for your friend's B2 in the tropics. That's what I would expect with no rinsing though. If he did 1000 dives in that decade and is in the habit of putting the gear away unrinsed (some people dive so much their gear does not get time to dry), then this makes perfect sense.

Many divers experience better longevity with piston regs than that, but I totally understand your point about diaphragm regs eliminating that weakness. If someone soaks their regs well and if service kits for piston regs were cheaper than diaphragm service kits, then piston regs can still have a place.
 
I love to bash Scubapro. They're the 800# gorilla. But of course, in the real world, their engineering and manufacturing techniques are superior. I have some qualms about their QC, as most of the regs I've purchased new in the past few years for teaching material have been poorly adjusted.
Mk25, Mk19EVO x2, Mk11, D420 x3, S270 ‐ only one of these new purchases (Mk11) was ready to dive. But if the shops adjust them before they go out the door? No problem.
Yeah, in the floaty grit world of beach diving, I'm a little hyper-aware of trapped grit at the piston head o-ring. But also yeah, @happy-diver is right: you can keep a piston sealed at 135 psi over all sorts of cobblestone corrosion, with or without polishing the seal. But if they'd all been sealed with messy goop they'd still be pristine. Except...messy goop.
Here's why I keep harping on this and stirring you guys up. I'm not so focused on those awful examples whose pics I keep posting every year. They're just 20 regs over all these years whose pictures I keep because they show the problem, from minor beginning to awful end.
No, what breaks my heart is the customer who I eventually sold a Mk19EVO to, when his UNsealed Atomic B2 died after a decade. He lived in the tropics; he owned a resort; he was a 0/10 when it came to preventive maintenance.
Things were pretty filled with verdigris the first service. But a little time in the ultrasonic cleaned him right up. Two years later, he sent the same thing back to me (now at about 10 years total reg age). Now, the ambient holes were bubbling every five seconds or so. Just a tiny bubble.
A quick polish to the piston head seal and a new HP oring and it was still happening. It was slow enough that you could actually tell by tilting the reg underwater that the air was coming from the piston head side.
So I started to polish the piston head sealing area in the body again with a little 8,000 grit Micromesh, and decided to look under the microscope. The area was filled with pits that propagated under the chrome. When you polished to the bottom of one microscopic scratch, a whole array of gaps opened up. I could not fix this short of replacing the body (which I did when he left the reg with me in trade for a new Mk19EVO).
Un-rinsed salt crystals (and coral debris?), scratching the reg at every first pressurization, had worn through the chrome in microscopic areas in the space of a few years. Continued neglect after my first gentle scolding (because life and business just got in the way of attention to his gear) continued the corrosion until the reg was toast within a decade.

So I'm a guy that wants a valve to work forever, if the only parts rubbing against each other are chrome against rubber. When a design allows the accumulation of crystalline debris at a critical seal, I'm offended. If you can fix it with an overnight soak in the sink and a good flush, you can make it work for 50 years. But the average diver does a marginal job of that, and that's how I get my pictures, as well as an excuse to stir the pot here on SB.

From a purist's POV, an unsealed piston in salt water is planned deterioration. But if you don't look for a problem, you won't find one. These toys are pretty robust, and how many divers check their gear with an IP gauge and submerged observation every year?

So for every OP that posts, "Do we really need a $60 Christo-lube fill?", I'll say "Heck, yes!"
And all my friends here on Scubaboard will say, "Naw!". And we're both right. Just depends on your POV.
:stirpot:
If you didnt rinse a DS4 for 10 years you'd: 1) never get the environmental cap off and 2) have stopped diving it around year 3 anyway when the HP seat failed
 
If you didnt rinse a DS4 for 10 years you'd: 1) never get the environmental cap off and 2) have stopped diving it around year 3 anyway when the HP seat failed

I have a US4 workhorse regulator that hasn’t been serviced in over 6 years (2018). I can’t comment on the environmental cap, but the HP seat is working flawlessly. 🤞

There used to be issues with the Apeks’ HP seat life (maybe a batch of bad material) but that issue is long since resolved.

And since the internal parts of a diaphragm regulator never get wet, not rinsing wouldn’t affect its performance.
 
What may seem like a good idea on paper doesn’t always turn out a good idea. I look on gunk and fine grit ( in the photo a day after lancing) as grinding paste so no filling first stages for me. I did think I’ll use my Poseidon cyclone 300 and save having to hose out the mk5, it worked a treat in very heavy silt till that large exhaust valve got dirty and it started to breathe wet, that’s when I found out the Poseidon hates vigorous purging, it nearly froze the teeth out of me it free flowed so bad. I also tried a Davor pacer, it too free flowed and the maintenance guy I brought it to had the nerve to tell me “ rust from the tank got through the filter and ruined the first stage “ so I sent it to the good people at Dacor who gave me a free first stage and a photo showing the damage the maintenance guy did.
 

Attachments

  • bunker coal dust.jpeg
    bunker coal dust.jpeg
    90.5 KB · Views: 20
I have a US4 workhorse regulator that hasn’t been serviced in over 6 years (2018). I can’t comment on the environmental cap, but the HP seat is working flawlessly. 🤞

There used to be issues with the Apeks’ HP seat life (maybe a batch of bad material) but that issue is long since resolved.

And since the internal parts of a diaphragm regulator never get wet, not rinsing wouldn’t affect its performance.
Wow, how many dives did the seat last?
 
If you didnt rinse a DS4 for 10 years you'd: 1) never get the environmental cap off and 2) have stopped diving it around year 3 anyway when the HP seat failed
Thanks, I was thinking about exactly that. And even titanium regs need regular dissasembly and lubrication of threads, or else they can be very hard to take apart.
 

Back
Top Bottom