SkullDeformity:
This is the BS I'm talking about. That 1/4 divers statistic is bull, and a woman at cove 2 died because she shot up from 100ft in panic and she was within NDL. She died via an embolism in her heart. Care to spout any more misinformation?
The 1/4 statistic is commonly cited by DAN. I am not at work so I don't have a lot of their literature in front of me to cite it though. According to the last set of Dive Rescue International materials I came across they had the statistic at over 60% when it comes to public safety divers and diving accidents at the surface.
A sudden ascent from 100ft is going to be dangerous no matter what. It won't always kill you though. Drowning because you failed to maintain positive buoyancy at the surface will.
The depth and NDLs do not matter at all when it comes to over expansion injuries. They can happen in as little as four feet of water. That's simply Boyle's Law in action.
In
openwater diving you need to have some sort of ditchable weight. I teach for 3 different agencies. I'm a NAUI Instructor Trainer, SSI Dive Control Specialist Instructor and SDI Master Instructor and all three agencies call for ditchable weight to be worn while diving. They do not advocate ditching the weight belt underwater unless absolutely necessary. That is why I teach swimming ascents before buoyant ascents. A buoyant ascent is used to prevent drowning. That's it. It's better to get a DCS hit than it is to drown.
However, even if you swam to the surface, once you are at the surface you need to ditch your weights if you cannot maintain positive buoyancy, for whatever reason, with the BC alone. This is the
very first question on the SSI Openwater Exam.
Your avatar makes it look like you are a cave diver or are at least heavily influenced by them. Not everything that works in a cave works 40 miles out at sea and not everything that works out at sea works in a cave. It's a lot different being at the surface on a calm spring than in salt water with six foot seas and a 1.5 knot current.