That actually explains a lot. It makes sense and is a good analogy. My apologies to Christi. Thanks for the logical explanation.
My original point though, that avoiding Kansas City due to the gang crime in LA is a poor analogy remains. According to the FBI 2010 stats, KC has a violent crime rate of 461 per 100,000 people while LA has a slightly lower rate of 442 violent crimes per 100,000. Not only does your safety in one have nothing to do with the other, both are places are dangerous so BTravlin's point may be valid, he just choose a poor set of locations to demonstrate it.
FBI — Table 6
Although similar stats are not available for Coz, I am sure it is nowhere close to either big city.
To those of you who think I am grumpy or like to argue, perhaps you are right. I prefer to think that I take the time it think critically though peoples claims and check the facts rather than take them at face value. News outlets, preachers and fellow posters on SB alike. I think its a good trait, but sometimes it can be overdone. Maybe I crossed the line and if I did so, please accept my apology.