FatCat:Mike,
I've always looked up to you, but now I'm starting to think that you've turned sour. I hope you find a way to renew your drive.
If by sour you mean that there are some agencies and manufacturers that I'll have nothing to do with and have nothing good to say about then yes I am sour. And I think they get people hurt too.
These things effect the type and quality of the class you'll get. Why not educate people?And yes, I wonder what prospective divers and novice divers think of this exchange. What is all this nonsense about standards and cutting corners and business expenses?
Is the theory behind diving so complicated that it takes college grads to teach it?
I don't think it takes a college grad
I believe many are...most? I can't say...but lotsAre most instructors incompetents?
Are dive shops rip off artists?
Artists? no. To be honest I think they're in a tough spot. The business model depends on them being willing to offer classes as a loss leader. The shop who tries to buck that has a tough nut to crack. It also depends on having instructors who will work really cheap. They can't set the requirements too high or they won't have any one to do it.
People, get real please. No it isn't all that difficult. Most courses are good and are aimed at a broad public. Most instructors are good and will do all they can to teach you how to become a diver within the scope of the course. The kind of mystification we're witnessing here is counterproductive. For the umpteenth time: it isn't rocket science.
I disagree that most courses are good.
And hey guys, here's another piece of mystification to think about: you often see the advice that a prospective diver would be wise to choose an instructor who has certified at least x (fill in your own number, please) divers.
I don't think your decision to hire or not hire an instructor should be based on how many certs they've issued.