kent_1848
Guest
MissyP:And Kent, no... you don't have to be "rich" to have a pet. If you have financial stability and/or have pet health care insurance, then so be it. However, if you're struggling to make ends meet, do you really think you need the added burden of having a pet?
I guess I'm looking at the millions of people in this country, who have pets, that would not be able to spend thousands to have their pets live a while longer. Would these pets have been better off being put to sleep when they were born because there was no one that could spend that kind of money on them just in case something happened? There are millions of of happy pets out there, that will either be put to sleep, or put down by their owners if anything like what has been described here happened to them. Saying that you have to be financially stable or have pet health insurance is classism, shows prejudice, and a lack of compassion for those less well off than yourself. I can't even fathom telling my kids that certain people should not have pets because they wouldn't be able to afford a $2,000 vet bill! How are their pets less happy than yours? Do you only know well off people, and look down on those who could not afford the kinds of vet bills we are seeing here? What happens if, God forbid, you had a turn in your financial situation? Would you get rid of all your pets?