However, you have yet to show how being at 30 degrees is 'more efficient'.
It's more efficient for the specific task, because with your arms you'll cover a much bigger area efficiently. Efficient isn't just being hydrodynamic, but performing the task in the best possible way. It's always a compromise.
Just saying it, doesn't make it so. Physics teaches us that a 30-degree angle is incredibly inefficient when propelling anything. That means that 33% of your thrust is downward, with only 66% pushing the mass forward. I would rather have a 100% of my thrust pushing the object. You'll need to overweight yourself to keep from floating up and once you stop kicking, you're sunk. Literally, you'll sink unless you add air to your BC. Once you start moving again, a third of your thrust will be pushing you to the surface, so you'll have to vent that air you just put in. Read my article on vectors. Physics doesn't lie.
I already explained why being tilted while operating a photo/video gear is better than being completely horizontally (see my previous messages)... but give a look at the end of this reply.
All the professional photographers I have seen make their cameras nigh on to neutral so they won't have to work hard. There's no supporting of weight when the camera is neutral so there's just no need for the angle. No, I just don't get it and I do disagree with your premise. Again, just because you've always 'done it that way' doesn't make it efficient.
You're mixing the weight of the camera (and btw having the camera neutral doesn't mean eliminating its mass) with its movement.
Maybe you should come dive with me and see how I do before you tell me how I can't do it.
You're again mentioning phrases that I never wrote in my posts. I never said that you can't do it, as I never said that you can't write your reply by using your nose.
This will explain the whole thing better (excuse me for my poor painting skills):
While being horizontally (picture on the left) you will cover a much smaller area that is concentrated below the diver (note that the apparent area is indeed identical, but after reaching the perpendicularity you gonna have your camera upside down, so that part will excluded from the normal working area). To film a subject in front of you, you will put your arm under stress, because to operate the camera you have to raise your arms towards your head, after a certain angle you have to tilt your whole body (coincidentally assuming the position on the right). Unless you're always filming stuff below you, you will accumulate fatigue in your arms (that doesn't depend by the weight of your camera, assuming it's neutral, but because of the muscles stretched along your body and arms).
On the right you see the position of a "common" videographer: it's far to be hydrodynamic, because you're exposing a larger portion of your body toward the mass of water. But the arms will be in a "natural" position to cover a larger area around you in a more efficient way, both in front of you and to your sides.
The first position is ideal to travel, and we are all using it (I mean there isn't even needed to comment it.. it's a fact); while the second position is ideal for filming.
In certain cases you'll be "forced" to use the first position while filming (I imagine in a cave or when you're near to the bottom and you won't risk to raise suspension or such or when there's current and you're forced to trade the comfort with the hydrodynamics) so it's definitely possible to film while in that position (hell... I can film with the camera on my back or while upside down!) ..but ideally you want to be in a much comfortable position for a smoother video (especially if you have to follow a subject longer than few seconds).
To resume (excuse me for the wall of text): there's ins't THE universally correct diving position, there's the position that is more comfortable for a given task. Now, if you aren't operating a camera and you're tilted like a sea horse, while scraping the bottom and agitating your hands like a puppy... you're surely doing something wrong, but that's another matter. I'm just saying that force yourself to be always horizontally, no matter what, is IMO a nonsense.
After this I think I would end here, because it's like circling endless.
