ScubaTexan:Damn, I'm out of popcorn....be right back![]()

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
ScubaTexan:Damn, I'm out of popcorn....be right back![]()
suthnbelle:I'll share so you won't miss anything!
Thats not popcorn...its an abominationjeckyll:Is it no-salt, no-butter minimalist popcorn??
![]()
Diesel298:it was a example to begin with..
im fimilar with alot of the whys,
i was simply stating that so many are quick to dismiss people as trolls when they have legit questions...
did you even read this thred or just jump onto bustin my chops?
AGAIN. mabye when people ask,, answer them with a real answer..
not
do a search
or i think hes a troll....
i think that the answer to the question was fine...
it was the
"if youi did a search you would find the answer" that makes the whole post seem smug
reefraff:What's worse? The newby that doesn't take advantage of the search functions and posts version 4803 of the same question or the the more seasoned cybernaut that stomps the newby because he can no longer emotionally cope with the irritation of seeing the same question asked again and again?
reefraff:Your observation seems to be contradicted by these comments in this thread:
LOL - Lamont needs to update his profile ...reefraff:Lamont, the need to read and answer every post on the board is a heavy burden and one that you shouldn't feel the need to shoulder by yourself. When you feel the frustration overpowering you, turn the computer off and go diving. Do that often enough and pretty soon your DIRF rating won't be provisional.
Gee, if you go back and look at who brought up the "troll" thing in this thread, you'll notice it was someone who has since said DIR is not for him (posts 11 and 20). Draw your own conclusions ...Diesel298:Everytime i see some post a question about "WHY" on this forum. they get flamed, and are considered a troll....
Diesel298:one thing im curious about is whats DIR got aganst the various fin designs?
ive seen that question posted a few times with no real answer given......
NWGratefulDiver:Gee, if you go back and look at who brought up the "troll" thing in this thread, you'll notice it was someone who has since said DIR is not for him (posts 11 and 20). Draw your own conclusions ...
He may not be able to - I've been unable to access that part of my profile for some time. And what ever happened to the "Active Threads" or the "Today's Posts" buttons? But I digress.NWGratefulDiver:LOL - Lamont needs to update his profile ...
Yeah, I may have been a little intemperate but I still think it's a fair question.Stephen Ash:Yah...I hate to see anyone get shut down harshly.
True enough. Diesel bought it - he should expect to pay for it. It's not necessary to collect every debt, however, and breaking knees isn't always the best place to start.I don't know...I suspect Diesel's lead-in...
Like I said, history belongs to the victors. The Hogarthian <insert adjective> was about more than just gear, it just wasn't enough more about more than just gear. You might be right about surrendering and letting the DIR crowd define the terms but I'm just quixotic enough to not mind the occasional tilt against the windmill. Besides, this is the Hog forum - tweaking DIR noses isn't just allowed in here, sometimes it's a civic duty.I agree with you that originally "Hogarthian" was much more than just gear. Exactly how much more... I don't know. I've read some things that suggests that it also included a team approach and a focus on fitness but any more than that seems a mystery. Fact is, the guys that brought us "Hogarthian" have not been very willing to talk about it much. One solitary post from Main and a few other posts by Gavin and English and that's about it. There simply isn't much to go on. Because of this, I think the only choice we have is to use the term as a descriptor of gear configuration... and even that is best defined by DIR.
I'd say he has a good understanding. They are closely connected, DIR being an outgrowth of Hogarthian. The superset analogy still seems to hold true: you can be a Hog diver without being DIR but you can't be DIR without being a Hog diver. Ultimately, the history isn't that important. I think that the best way to sum up the current state of affairs is thusly: DIR is an all-or-nothing proposal with little room for compromise. Those of us with "issues" with DIR or who are too namsy-pamsy to buy the whole loaf, (the so-called "DIR Lite" crowd) will always be at least a little unwelcome in the DIR tent but the Hog divers will be happy to set a plate at the table for you.KOMPRESSOR:In my fog of understanding, I thought these two (HOG & DIR) was strongly connected. From some of the answers I've read to my and other's questions, it seems something can be Hogarthian, but not DIR