"no"
Make sense?
It does now. At first glance I thought it was a typo that could have gone two ways:
they do noT require a buddy be with you
they do noW require a buddy be with you
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
"no"
Make sense?
On another forum, a poster (who also posts on SB) made an interesting observation. If you leave the stairs at the surface and swim toward the eye entrance, you can see the entrance to the ear to your left. You know the two entrances meet at beginning of the main line. What if you wanted to enter through the eye and exit at the ear? What you see before your very eyes tells you to go into until you meet the starting point and then turn left. If you look at the map (posted above) though, you will see that the entrance from the eye takes you past the ear, and you actually have to turn right. If you are looking for an opening to your left, what you will find is the catacombs.
In 1989 my AOW experiance dives were done at Blue grotto - all the way back and around the line for 2 dives. I would not recomend it.
Someone questioned my comment earlier about someone "wandering in to the catacombs". I am sorry I did not quote it or remember it. Internet is very slow here, especially this board. Took me 30 minutes just to view the new pages.
Anyway, I still stand behind that comment. I don't think anyone "wanders" in to the catacombs. I have dove them before and love them. The person made the decision to dive in to the cavern zone. The person made a decision to dive in to the cave. They made the decision to look just a little further and around the next corner. They made a decision to leave the light zone. They made the decision to dive above their level of training. It is possible they even made the decision to take a light, (we do not know for sure yet) which at OW they are not authorized to have. They made all these decisions after knowing good and well, Ginnie does a good job letting folks know, that he was not allowed to dive there. That is why I still say you do not wander in to the Catacombs.
I suppose. Currently there is-
- Information on the internet about not diving in caves without training
- A waiver that states do not go in the cave without trainnig.
- A video that states not to go in the cave without training.
- At least 3 signs around Devils on land that state do not go in the cave without training
- A sign in each devils eye and devils ear that states do not dive the cave without training.
If you believe a list of deaths would convince them not to do it, by all means suggest it to Rose. Personally I'm a bit skeptical.
I am very saddened. Hits close to home.But don't understand why an OW diver would go there.
Depends on how you define wanders. I've seen more than one person make the mistake of thinking the catacombs was either an exit or the main passage. If you know the cave it's easy to distinguish. If it's your first time there it's not so easy.
Now this rule is special. You have your 25 dives experience, but no caves! . . . If recreational diving treats other limits as guide lines, then can we expect persons to respect the one hard rule.