vshearer
Contributor
Eureka! I've got it. The reason nobody found any tanks at the nomount area is he was using Nik's "back-to-back" rig to push in front.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
So, I read the first highlighted quote to mean that the Sheriff's Office firmly believes he is in there? Given what you've all been saying about the lack of evidence such as scratches etc., (in your opinions) do they have any particular evidence supporting that belief or is it more of a supposition and/or best guess?
In a pre-op assessment, we do not consider a patient a non-smoker until they have been tobacco free for at least 10 years. There is at least one poster in this thread who classifies themselves as a DIR diver, who says smokers are not DIR, and has smoked a cigar (by their own admission on this board) within this time period. So what? I guess it goes back to some of the issues we have been discussing in this thread. Personal choice and freedom vs. following the suggestions of training agencies. If you follow the rules and the letter of the "law" you don't go in an overhead without propper training, but before you get too preachy, you can't really call yourself "DIR diver" if you admit to smoking the rare cigar either (if you follow the letter of the law). I guess it is a hard line to draw between the rules that most seem to agree with, and the rules that are pretty much BS. I personally don't feel we need the "scuba police" and let natural selection take it's course. We all have our personal level of risk aversion, my only problem is with those who screw up and die in a manner that threatens how the rest of us want to do things. If you want to call yourself a DIR diver and smoke a cigar every couple of years, who is that going to hurt (other than yourself)? Die in a cave, and it might shut down that cave for the rest of us. I think that preserving individual freedoms is more important than assuring the safety of all individuals.
vshearer:That is interesting in that I did not realize the end restriction in the tunnel was known to open up further in, I thought it just kept narrowing down. I assume over time it also has changed and possibly gotten even narrower due to shifting sand?
Where did you get that idea? It's not known. I've communicated with someone from the original team that laid the line back there and surveyed/mapped the cave and they don't know what happens after that restriction.
Sorry if this offends anyone...but I think all the cards need to be laid on the table.
Jail time? for what, exactly?The only cards that should have been laid on the table would have been his certification cards before he checked in; in which he was too lazy and cheap to earn. The guy was a cheat and deserves nothing less than jail time if he is caught alive. If he did die in that cave, he chose to take his own life. Attempting to put blame on anyone else besides Ben McDaniels is just stupid.
Kenny
So, I read the first highlighted quote to mean that the Sheriff's Office firmly believes he is in there? Given what you've all been saying about the lack of evidence such as scratches etc., (in your opinions) do they have any particular evidence supporting that belief or is it more of a supposition and/or best guess?
If he is still alive, how much you wanna' bet that he is following this thread?