Well, it's not tested, but as if that ever prevented someone from using something

.
People do a lot of things tha I don't agree with. Using something that is not tested, is one of these things.
Besides, here we are speaking about a company using a non-testend algorithm inside one of its devices; can you imagine the troubles if somebody gets hurted?
Still, it's linear in pressure, so far moderate altitudes it should be fine.
The fact that the model is linear just means that scientists "linearized" the behaviour of human body. Under which assumptions? I just do not know. Is it safe to use it at moderate altitude? Maybe yes, maybe not. What is a moderate altitude? The discussion can get a bit complicated.
There is a post from
@boulderjohn somewhere here on SB, if I remeber well. I recall that there is no scientific data to understand how things change with altitude, so divers usually are very conservative. I don't have a lot of experience, so if you are more interested in the subject you can search that topic or ask John. And maybe you can correct me if I am wrong
As for exercise, I thought consensus was that heavy exercising while desaturating increased DCS risk. So in that sense doing 8000m in a flash is a bad idea.
Yes, this is the consensus; and, if I remember well, also heavy exercises just before diving is considered dangerous. But these are just guidelines, and they are not enough to build an algorithm...
My point here is just that, with such a lack of data, I would be really surprised if a company starts using this algorithm in this unknown piece of land, given the legal risk.
But I am ready to change my mind and to feel surprised