jtivat:I am really just trying to say that I do think most classes at least here do teach you to dive with a buddy (if there buddy training is up to par is not relevant) and people just chose to ignore this.
Oh, come on. It doesn't take 10 minutes looking at the text or the standards to see what it is that divers are being taught and not taught.
It did not sound like these buddy were lost on an accent or decent one just chose to go off on there own and find the other group (not sure this is the case but it is stated here and people seem to be bashing based on this info). And then all hell breaks loose with the agency bashing yup it is all there fault and nobody should take responsibility for them self.
No, in these cases, the seperation didn't occure on ascent or descent. I used those as examples because divers are often seperated then and most dives start with a descent.
However, something else that you won't find mentioned in the text is the fact that descents and ascents are dynamic portions of the dive where problems are most likely to occure. They are times when you need to be especially on your toes, prepared and able to respond. Would you agree? I think we can find supporting evidence for that easy enough. Yet in Vans case, they intentionally seperated by letting him return alone.
Everyone is responsible for themselves. When it comes to dive training I think that responsibility starts with understanding what they are purchasing when they purchase training. You know the saying...they just don't know what it is that they don't know.
Shouldn't the agency also be responsible for what they do? Who wrote the standards? Who trained and/or authorizes an instructor? Whos name is right on the card? how is it that nothing is their fault or responsibility?