Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Wow again. Contradictions between what he's telling people in writing on facebook and what he had his lawyer tell people in writing will likely be a problem in court. Regardless of what really happened, it certainly casts some doubt on the veracity of his statements. I am guessing that is the exact reason folks involved in an accident don't usually comment.
. . . sounded like he was reading some opinions of this board [and other online sources] word [for] word
Well well well.
Wow again. Contradictions between what he's telling people in writing on facebook and what he had his lawyer tell people in writing will likely be a problem in court. Regardless of what really happened, it certainly casts some doubt on the veracity of his statements. I am guessing that is the exact reason folks involved in an accident don't usually comment.
I guess it's a good thing this wasn't a U.S. Navy dive.In addition he cites that Mr Sotis has a different set of standards for decompression than the Navy and what is considered acceptable.
I'm sure someone will sue me for poor grammar, maybe I should sue my old teachersThis.
So you are saying you believe it is safe to do four dives to 220 in a day if you are on a rebreather? I'm not arguing, I'm in the uninformed crowd. I've certainly seen a lot of folks suggesting otherwise.One of the benefits of CCR is they can enable new modalities for diving. The training standards for CCR specifies a minimum number of total dives and minimum number of total minutes, not how many per day.. that's controlled by decompression requirements and oxygen exposure limits. Although realistically, most students cease learning when over tired, so there is a practical limit.
While diving personally, in one day I've done as many as five dives with required stops. My Shearwater has never displayed a "Too Many Dives Today" warning. With modern dive computers, all it takes is a bit of forethought and enough surface interval credit not to exceed oxygen exposure limits. While that last dive is going to keep you on some annoyingly long stops, the number of dives per day is not particularly in violation of some "rule" built in to the deco algorithm itself.
I suspect the number of dives issue is an example of something the attorneys have picked up from uninformed, or outdated, internet discussion.
I doubt there have been many studies done with bounce or short duration dives involving such depths. If so I've not seen one but if we can agree that sawtooth profiles are bad at recreational depths it stands to reason multiple short duration dives to 60+ meters would also be dangerous.So you are saying you believe it is safe to do four dives to 220 in a day if you are on a rebreather? I'm not arguing, I'm in the uninformed crowd. I've certainly seen a lot of folks suggesting otherwise.
So you are saying you believe it is safe to do four dives to 220 in a day if you are on a rebreather? I'm not arguing, I'm in the uninformed crowd. I've certainly seen a lot of folks suggesting otherwise.